Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Phils' Dragon Me262A-1/U4

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    #31
    The turned barrel looks to be of nice quality. Are you doing an open breech and open cannon bay or all closed up? I have never seen a modeller do a 262U4 with an open cannon bay. There are plenty of photos of 262U4s with open breeches and bays, so it would be nice to see something different


    Of note, you should prime all the turned metal parts. Or, even better, slightly scuff up the metal with a scotch pad, then apply cellulose based Mr Surfacer 1000, then apply the real colours. This will impart an extremely tough adhesion to the metal to paint.


    John

    Comment

    • PhilJ
      SMF Supporters
      • May 2015
      • 1145

      #32
      Originally posted by \
      The turned barrel looks to be of nice quality. Are you doing an open breech and open cannon bay or all closed up? I have never seen a modeller do a 262U4 with an open cannon bay. There are plenty of photos of 262U4s with open breeches and bays, so it would be nice to see something different
      Of note, you should prime all the turned metal parts. Or, even better, slightly scuff up the metal with a scotch pad, then apply cellulose based Mr Surfacer 1000, then apply the real colours. This will impart an extremely tough adhesion to the metal to paint.


      John
      Hi john


      Just had a late one, yes I am going to have a open cannon bay, although I must say I have not seen any pics of a open bay with the 50mm cannon that I can remember.


      Funnily enough I glued then lightly keyed the barrel before two light coats of Vallejo primer, I waited for it to dry then added two light dusts of alclad II steel followed with a dust of alclad II burnt iron on the muzzle.


      It's a subtle contrast but it's come out very nice and I'm happy with the result.


      Assembled cannon picture hopefully tomorrow night along with some weathered internal fuse pics.


      Cheers


      Phil

      Comment

      • Guest

        #33
        Originally posted by \
        Hi john
        Just had a late one, yes I am going to have a open cannon bay, although I must say I have not seen any pics of a open bay with the 50mm cannon that I can remember.


        Funnily enough I glued then lightly keyed the barrel before two light coats of Vallejo primer, I waited for it to dry then added two light dusts of alclad II steel followed with a dust of alclad II burnt iron on the muzzle.


        It's a subtle contrast but it's come out very nice and I'm happy with the result.


        Assembled cannon picture hopefully tomorrow night along with some weathered internal fuse pics.


        Cheers


        Phil
        I can send you a few photos of open ones if you want


        John

        Comment

        • Guest

          #34
          Originally posted by \
          Hi john
          Just had a late one, yes I am going to have a open cannon bay, although I must say I have not seen any pics of a open bay with the 50mm cannon that I can remember.


          Funnily enough I glued then lightly keyed the barrel before two light coats of Vallejo primer, I waited for it to dry then added two light dusts of alclad II steel followed with a dust of alclad II burnt iron on the muzzle.


          It's a subtle contrast but it's come out very nice and I'm happy with the result.


          Assembled cannon picture hopefully tomorrow night along with some weathered internal fuse pics.


          Cheers


          Phil
          When using large metal pieces, I use a hand blowtorch and solder iron and solder, and bond metal to metal. A much more effective method than glue

          Comment

          • PhilJ
            SMF Supporters
            • May 2015
            • 1145

            #35
            Originally posted by \
            I can send you a few photos of open ones if you want
            John
            Yeah you can do john if you don't mind.


            Cheers


            Phil

            Comment

            • Guest

              #36
              Here you go


              [ATTACH]115145.IPB[/ATTACH]



              [ATTACH]115146.IPB[/ATTACH]


              [ATTACH]115144.IPB[/ATTACH]





              Comment

              • Snowman
                SMF Supporters
                • Oct 2014
                • 2098

                #37
                Originally posted by \
                Here you go
                You don't think this nose looks to big do you??o_O


                Damn, they sure were in a rush to shoot down those Allied bombers!!


                The down side with larger calibre weapons is that you are restricted to the amount of ammo that you can carry as you have already imposed a massive weight penalty by fitting the cannon. Another issue is that you have to very accurate with the limited ammo to realise the benefits of firing such a large explosive projectile.ops:


                I'm not too sure that bigger is always better.......just look at the Maus.

                Comment

                • Guest

                  #38
                  Originally posted by \
                  You don't think this nose looks to big do you??o_O
                  Damn, they sure were in a rush to shoot down those Allied bombers!!


                  The down side with larger calibre weapons is that you are restricted to the amount of ammo that you can carry as you have already imposed a massive weight penalty by fitting the cannon. Another issue is that you have to very accurate with the limited ammo to realise the benefits of firing such a large explosive projectile.ops:


                  I'm not too sure that bigger is always better.......just look at the Maus.
                  still don't understand why they call it the maus/mouse.


                  The reason why it (262) never entered mainstream production, was because the large calibre flak gun would jam at high Gs, especially when reloading


                  John

                  Comment

                  • PhilJ
                    SMF Supporters
                    • May 2015
                    • 1145

                    #39
                    Originally posted by \
                    Here you go
                    [ATTACH]126316[/ATTACH]


                    [ATTACH]126317[/ATTACH]
                    I've seen these john, sorry I thought you meant a more detailed photo of inside the bay. I don't think such a photo exists although I have found some photos of the cannon alone inside a museum


                    Cheers


                    Phil

                    Comment

                    • PhilJ
                      SMF Supporters
                      • May 2015
                      • 1145

                      #40
                      Office finished with Matt Vallejo and underneath with klear and a mix of Vallejo black wash with umber pastel dust

                      [ATTACH]115170.IPB[/ATTACH]

                      Attached Files

                      Comment

                      • Robert1968
                        • Mar 2015
                        • 3596

                        #41
                        Just caught up on this and after reading comments etc think I'll tag along from here on in


                        Looking good so far Phil, I did the me262 last year with the six cannon and what I can remember there were no fit issues and enjoyed the kit however never put in all the wiring like you have


                        Awesome office ( lots of colour and interest there so far


                        Regards


                        Robert

                        Comment

                        • Guest

                          #42
                          The piping looks great.. stay on the medium-light side on weathering as these aircraft were only 1-3 months old when they entered production., especially the prototypes. There should be a seen difference in hte nose section to the fuselage and wings in terms of weathering. The engine should look fairly new as well, as these were replaced every 3 days or so. Unless you are aiming for a museum aircraft, (which there are none of the U4)


                          Cheers, John

                          Comment

                          • Guest

                            #43
                            Originally posted by \
                            I've seen these john, sorry I thought you meant a more detailed photo of inside the bay. I don't think such a photo exists although I have found some photos of the cannon alone inside a museum
                            Cheers


                            Phil
                            I do have a pic of a U4 looking onto the flak gun from above. That is the best pic I have, but I will have to find it

                            Comment

                            • Robert1968
                              • Mar 2015
                              • 3596

                              #44
                              Originally posted by \
                              The piping looks great.. stay on the medium-light side on weathering as these aircraft were only 1-3 months old when they entered production., especially the prototypes. There should be a seen difference in hte nose section to the fuselage and wings in terms of weathering. The engine should look fairly new as well, as these were replaced every 3 days or so. Unless you are aiming for a museum aircraft, (which there are none of the U4)
                              Cheers, John
                              Hi john


                              Now your obviously an ME 262 nut!! Pardon the pun but from my research into this aircraft and its derivatives did the me262 when it first went under testing have a tail drag landing gear? I'm sure I saw a you tube video on this. Now it would be nice to see an early version of this in kit form other than the experimental versions that eduard do?


                              Do you know how


                              1 I would be able to obtain the kit for a latter project


                              2 if such aircraft existed what was the serial no or build number for reference purposes ( 1/48 would be my preferred kit build


                              Regards


                              Robert

                              Comment

                              • Guest

                                #45
                                Originally posted by \
                                Hi john
                                Now your obviously an ME 262 nut!! Pardon the pun but from my research into this aircraft and its derivatives did the me262 when it first went under testing have a tail drag landing gear? I'm sure I saw a you tube video on this. Now it would be nice to see an early version of this in kit form other than the experimental versions that eduard do?


                                Do you know how


                                1 I would be able to obtain the kit for a latter project


                                2 if such aircraft existed what was the serial no or build number for reference purposes ( 1/48 would be my preferred kit build


                                Regards


                                Robert
                                Yes. I am an me 262 nut- look at my avatar! Yes I think special hobby or one of the Czech manufacturers do it. I would like to do an early prototype German Me 262. I saw it at the Australian model expo, but I had burnt my budget limit by then


                                -High Planes do an Me 262V1


                                -MPM Me 262V9


                                Oh and for your info, Revell do excellent 1/72 luft 46 in mainstream production


                                Special hobby also do an He 280 for your reference


                                John

                                Comment

                                Working...