I agree totally with what you write, Ian.
But my point was that mention 'Chipping', and some modellers tend to chip the whole model. To my mind this is wrong. As we all know, any kind of chipping is done by summat hard hitting the paintwork. With an aircraft this is usually on the leading edges, engine cowl and prop. Not all over. The rest of the paint loss is, as you point out, lack of adhesion, rather than damage. That's why I resisted the 'full chip' and tried to get a more general worn and knackered look to the paintwork.
I know it sounds a bit pedantic and picky, but that's how I see it. But others will see it differently, which is fine, and in the modelling world that is how it should be too.
Any road up, I'm glad you like the model, and thanks for the feedback.
Ron.
P.S. I haven't a clue what paint was used. For all I know, it could have been B&Q's finest green emulsion!
But my point was that mention 'Chipping', and some modellers tend to chip the whole model. To my mind this is wrong. As we all know, any kind of chipping is done by summat hard hitting the paintwork. With an aircraft this is usually on the leading edges, engine cowl and prop. Not all over. The rest of the paint loss is, as you point out, lack of adhesion, rather than damage. That's why I resisted the 'full chip' and tried to get a more general worn and knackered look to the paintwork.
I know it sounds a bit pedantic and picky, but that's how I see it. But others will see it differently, which is fine, and in the modelling world that is how it should be too.
Any road up, I'm glad you like the model, and thanks for the feedback.
Ron.
P.S. I haven't a clue what paint was used. For all I know, it could have been B&Q's finest green emulsion!
Comment