Karls RAF Journey. Pt1. Airfix 1/72 Spitfire Mk.1a.
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Great work karl , my iPhone sometimes messes about with the colours too , it depends upon the background colour , something way too complicated for me to understand but I just try a few different backgrounds to see what the colours look like when taking the final pics. An example is my own airfix 1/72 spitfire I did a while back for the BOB group build.I used a black background and it made the colours look really washed out , but when photographing a silver or natural metal subject black really makes it stand out .Comment
-
Great work karl , my iPhone sometimes messes about with the colours too , it depends upon the background colour , something way too complicated for me to understand but I just try a few different backgrounds to see what the colours look like when taking the final pics. An example is my own airfix 1/72 spitfire I did a while back for the BOB group build.I used a black background and it made the colours look really washed out , but when photographing a silver or natural metal subject black really makes it stand out .
My lamp has flouro tubes and my overhead is LED, I suspect the flicker from the tube lamp is causing some sort of interference at the image sensor on the phones camera. Didn't get it with my old phone though so that's progress for you........Comment
-
The picture issues you are describing are a combination of the light source and the algorithm used by the camera when taking JPG images Karl.
The fluorescent tube is probably a “warm” colour temperature one. These are favoured in temperate climates, and by emphasising yellow and red tones make us feel warmer in the colder darker winter months. They are analogous to the old fashioned yellow tinged bulbs used for very many years. Apparently those in tropical climates prefer cool blue toned tubes for precisely the opposite reasons. They give the user a sense of being cooler……..
The phone camera takes JPEG pictures. These are post shot processed by an inbuilt enhancement algorithm designed to emphasise the same tones to make the picture “pop” and be brighter and more appealing to the viewer. You can’t switch this off, it is an integral part of the JPEG image, and is why photography enthusiasts and professionals shoot in what is called RAW format. RAW is not manipulated in any way and shows exact what is seen by the sensor on the camera. The photographer can then process the image on software such as photoshop and only bring in the enhancements they want.
Combined, these aspects could well be responsible for the anomalies you see. If you want to minimise it for your model shots, just use a mid grey background in place of the cutting mat. This should help the sensors get the correct exposure and also minimise any over enhancements and colour casts.
Still think it looks good though :thumb2:Comment
-
I do have a proper camera, but the phone is handier for quick shots in the shed.
My lamp has flouro tubes and my overhead is LED, I suspect the flicker from the tube lamp is causing some sort of interference at the image sensor on the phones camera. Didn't get it with my old phone though so that's progress for you........Comment
-
Comment
-
Guest
It’s an integral part of the camera software you’re using on the phone. JPEG just encodes the pixels and usually a colour profile,¹ but the camera software does the processing you talked about and saves that as part of the JPEG it produces. I’ve never looked into it, but I suppose there must be different apps for taking pictures with that don’t do this kind of thing?
FWIW, I would recommend not taking photos of models with a cluttered background, but use a fairly even-coloured one — just a sheet of coloured paper or thin card that you can buy in any stationer’s or craft shop will do fine. Also, I tend to switch on the HDR option on my iPad when taking model photos, especially ones where there is little contrast between colours (like white plastic card against grey kit parts) because it generally produces photos in which the details are more visible.
¹ That last one is a kind of specification of how the phone’s camera sees colours, so that other devices can change the colours they display to hopefully match.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It’s an integral part of the camera software you’re using on the phone. JPEG just encodes the pixels and usually a colour profile,¹ but the camera software does the processing you talked about and saves that as part of the JPEG it produces. I’ve never looked into it, but I suppose there must be different apps for taking pictures with that don’t do this kind of thing?
As I said above, if you don’t want that sort of processing in your picture shoot in RAW mode. The files are much larger but are generated exactly as the sensor sees them. It’s not an app, it’s processing free. It just saves the picture direct from the sensor without any image processing. On an IPhone, for example, you apparently use Apple ProRAW as your setting.Comment
-
[ATTACH=CONFIG]n1185422[/ATTACH]
Same picture, flouro tubes off, no interference cast.
I do have a shooting table with an infinity curve some where, moved house losing a bedroom and garage in the process, still not recovered everything from everywhere it went while getting a shed built. But for quick WIPs the bench will do.Comment
Comment