If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I built one of these last year.Its a nice kit.The 'Rivet counters' reckon the fuselage is too short.But to me the finished model looks good next to my mk1 and mk12.
I built one of these last year.Its a nice kit.The 'Rivet counters' reckon the fuselage is too short.But to me the finished model looks good next to my mk1 and mk12.
Having spent several hours, at Duxford, when Hasegawa (for that's to whom it belongs) first issued this kit, checking its dimensions against three airframes, for a modelling magazine (and finding that it is, indeed, short,) it would be appreciated if "researchers" replaced the expression "rivet counters." It's now known that Hasegawa used a set of dud drawings from a highly-regarded Japanese book, as a template for their moulds.
Having spent several hours, at Duxford, when Hasegawa (for that's to whom it belongs) first issued this kit, checking its dimensions against three airframes, for a modelling magazine (and finding that it is, indeed, short,) it would be appreciated if "researchers" replaced the expression "rivet counters." It's now known that Hasegawa used a set of dud drawings from a highly-regarded Japanese book, as a template for their moulds.Edgar
I know it isn't Completely accurate.I was just saying it still looks good to those of us that are not worried if the dimensions are a millimetre or two out here and there.As long as it looks like a spitfire mkIX which this kit does, then those of us who are not ' rivet counters' are happy to build them.Ive got another one of these in my stash and also one of the new Eduard kits.The Eduard is definately a better kit , but I will still build the Hasegawa/Revell kit some day.
Having spent several hours, at Duxford, when Hasegawa (for that's to whom it belongs) first issued this kit, checking its dimensions against three airframes, for a modelling magazine (and finding that it is, indeed, short,) it would be appreciated if "researchers" replaced the expression "rivet counters." It's now known that Hasegawa used a set of dud drawings from a highly-regarded Japanese book, as a template for their moulds.Edgar
Edgar
'Rivet counters' refers to people who are over-zealous in their search for accuracy, not anyone genuinely involved in determining if a kit is accurate.
I can be a rivet counter myself about AFV models on occasion!
I know it isn't Completely accurate.I was just saying it still looks good to those of us that are not worried if the dimensions are a millimetre or two out here and there.As long as it looks like a spitfire mkIX which this kit does, then those of us who are not ' rivet counters' are happy to build them.Ive got another one of these in my stash and also one of the new Eduard kits.The Eduard is definately a better kit , but I will still build the Hasegawa/Revell kit some day.
nice looking cockpit so far Dave, There is a difference between researchers and rivet counters I do research into my kits but there are those who go above and beyond and take things far beyond the extreme.
Thanks for all the compliments folks, I'm definitely in the "if it looks right" category although I will research stuff, I've started a nasty (expensive) habit of getting the Haynes manuals for stuff.
Have put fuselage & wings together tonight & given them a coat of primer
Have got a lot to do this weekend & next so this will be the odd 20/30 mins here & there for a while now
Comment