Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Completed Revell 1/48 Aggressor

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boatman
    SMF Supporters
    • Nov 2018
    • 14482
    • christopher
    • NORFOLK UK

    #16
    Originally posted by john i am
    Hi Chris thanks for your feedback. There was no callout in the instructions for a decal on the wing and only two were supplied on the decal sheet. These were placed on the fuselage as directed. I have however after previously looking at lots of Aggressors on the internet seen them with/without stars and bars. I do have some spare decals from previous kits that I could use now you've raised the question but for now I'll leave it. The only decals I normally leave out are the ones you have to wear glasses for while looking through a jewellers loop and a magnifying lamp at the same time.
    Cheers John
    OK John if that's how its meant to be then yes most certainly leave it but i'll say this this model is one of the most pleasing planes ive ever seen an the camo is just right for me it ticks all the boxes VERY WELL DONE :thumb2:
    chris

    Comment

    • Guest

      #17
      Very good! And also really liked the color scheme! :smiling::thumb2:

      Comment

      • boatman
        SMF Supporters
        • Nov 2018
        • 14482
        • christopher
        • NORFOLK UK

        #18
        HI John whats the difference between the tiger an your Aggressor ? as when I last built one eons ago they were called freedom fighters if I remember rightly
        chris

        Comment

        • john i am
          SMF Supporters
          • Apr 2012
          • 4019

          #19
          Originally posted by boatman
          HI John whats the difference between the tiger an your Aggressor ? as when I last built one eons ago they were called freedom fighters if I remember rightly
          chris
          Hi Chris in answer to your question my honest answer is I don't know. I did watch a video on you tube which talked about the aggressor and the tiger but I obviously wasn't giving it enough attention at the time.I do have a tiger in the stash somewhere so I imagine I'll be watching the videos again. Sorry I couldn't help. Cheers JohnClick image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1008.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.4 KB
ID:	1122750

          Comment

          • john i am
            SMF Supporters
            • Apr 2012
            • 4019

            #20
            Originally posted by boatman
            HI John whats the difference between the tiger an your Aggressor ? as when I last built one eons ago they were called freedom fighters if I remember rightly
            chris
            There you go Chris a quick google search. :smiling2:

            Background
            The F-5 was developed by Northrop Grumman for export through the Military Assistance Program (MAP) in February 1965. This aircraft was initially offered as a candidate for a U.S. lightweight fighter, but became extremely popular as an export finding its niche in the overseas market. In December 1970, Northrop Grumman began development and production on the F-5A-21, an aircraft design that emphasized maneuverability rather than high speed and was officially reclassified as the F-5E. The F-5N/Fs are third-generation F-5 fighter aircraft designed for replacement of the F-5A/B/E production models. These aging aircraft were replaced by low-hour F-5E/F aircraft acquired from the Swiss Air Force surplus by United States Navy (USN) in 2006.

            The Swiss aircraft were updated as F-5N/Fs with modernized avionics and other improved systems and re-baselined by Northrup Grumman to USN configuration which provided a safer, lower-flight time Adversary aircraft with increased capability for Department of Navy (DoN) pilots. These aircraft are assigned to Government facilities, namely, NAS Key West, Florida, MCAS Yuma, Arizona, and NAS Fallon, Nevada and continue to support the adversary training mission.

            Comment

            • Gary MacKenzie
              SMF Supporter
              • Apr 2018
              • 1057
              • Gary
              • Forres , Moray , Scotland

              #21
              Originally posted by boatman
              HI John whats the difference between the tiger an your Aggressor ? as when I last built one eons ago they were called freedom fighters if I remember rightly
              chris
              The F-5 was also adopted as an opposing forces (OPFOR) "aggressor" for dissimilar training role because of its small size and performance similarities to the Soviet MiG-21. @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_F-5

              Comment

              • boatman
                SMF Supporters
                • Nov 2018
                • 14482
                • christopher
                • NORFOLK UK

                #22
                OK Gary cheers for the info
                chris

                Comment

                • colin m
                  Moderator
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 8755
                  • Colin
                  • Stafford, UK

                  #23
                  Great finish John. I really like the aggressor scheme. I must try something 'aggressor like' one day.

                  Comment

                  Working...