Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Revell / Matchbox 1:32 De Havilland Sea Venom

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • colin m
    Moderator
    • Dec 2008
    • 8741
    • Colin
    • Stafford, UK

    #1

    Revell / Matchbox 1:32 De Havilland Sea Venom

    Completed at last. My thoughts on the model ? It's a decent build for the £25.00 it cost me to buy. However, today's prices can be around £60 to £70, which no, it's not worth that sort of money. However, if you really want a 1:32 Sea Venom, I think this is the only one in this scale.
    The fit was ok given its age. Detail was very lacking. Again, that's an age thing.

    So what is it, well, the Sea Venom was the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm's first all-weather jet fighter which first flew in 1951 and retired 1970.
    They were also operated by French and Australian Navy's.
    Developed from the Venom NF2, some modifications were made, obviously, a hook to stop the aircraft on deck, folding wings and the canopy was modified to allow under water ejection.

    Sea Venom's actually saw active service. Operation Musketeer, the Anglo-French attack on the Suez Canal and other conflicts in the middle East.

    Vital statistics;
    Top Speed 575 ish MPH at sea level.
    Range 613 nmiles
    Service ceiling 39500 ft
    Rate of climb, 5750ft/min

    Armament consisted of;
    4x 20mm cannon
    8 x 60lb RP3 rockets (as used in WW2)
    2 x 1000lb bombs.

    Only 39 FAW22's were built.
    This model is the De Havilland Sea Venom FAW.22, XG693 of 894 NAS, FAA, HMS Albion, 1960.
    Delivered on 8th January 1957, retired to Tain ranges, Scotland 15th November 1968 and so ended its life as target practice.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	1.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	5.3 KB
ID:	1194544

    Click image for larger version

Name:	2.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	4.4 KB
ID:	1194545

    Click image for larger version

Name:	3.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	4.4 KB
ID:	1194546

    Click image for larger version

Name:	4.JPG
Views:	8
Size:	4.0 KB
ID:	1194547

    Click image for larger version

Name:	5.JPG
Views:	6
Size:	5.1 KB
ID:	1194548

    Click image for larger version

Name:	6.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	4.4 KB
ID:	1194549

    Click image for larger version

Name:	7.JPG
Views:	5
Size:	5.2 KB
ID:	1194550

    Click image for larger version

Name:	8.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	5.0 KB
ID:	1194551

    Click image for larger version

Name:	9.JPG
Views:	5
Size:	4.3 KB
ID:	1194552

    Any questions or comments, fire away.
  • adt70hk
    SMF Supporters
    • Sep 2019
    • 10409

    #2
    Colin,

    Despite its age it's turned out very nicely indeed. Very well done.

    Andrew

    Comment

    • Steve Brodie
      SMF Supporters
      • Sep 2014
      • 4652

      #3
      thats superb

      Comment

      • Mark1
        • Apr 2021
        • 4156

        #4
        Very nice Colin youve made a lovely job out of that.

        Comment

        • Ian M
          Administrator
          • Dec 2008
          • 18266
          • Ian
          • Falster, Denmark

          #5
          From a normal viewing point that is actually rather nice but as you said Colin, once you start to look into all the nooks and crannies, it shows its age.
          Great build and Finish.
          Group builds

          Bismarck

          Comment

          • The Smythe Meister
            • Jan 2019
            • 6248

            #6
            Totally agree,that does look very nice indeed Colin ..... and it's got Shark's teeth!!
            Nice bit of back story too.... it does make me wonder though.....
            When you take the money spent on all off the people involved in designing and actually building the things,then factor in the cost of making the components...add to that,costings to making the tools that make those components......
            .... all to make just 39 of em!!....
            Just HOW MUCH did it finally work out that each one cost?!!

            Comment

            • adt70hk
              SMF Supporters
              • Sep 2019
              • 10409

              #7
              Originally posted by The Smythe Meister
              Totally agree,that does look very nice indeed Colin :smiling3: ..... and it's got Shark's teeth!!
              Nice bit of back story too.... it does make me wonder though.....
              When you take the money spent on all off the people involved in designing and actually building the things,then factor in the cost of making the components...add to that,costings to making the tools that make those components......
              .... all to make just 39 of em!!....
              Just HOW MUCH did it finally work out that each one cost?!!
              More than I earn in a year.....or decade for that matter!

              Comment

              • The Smythe Meister
                • Jan 2019
                • 6248

                #8
                Originally posted by adt70hk
                More than I earn in a year.....or decade for that matter!
                ... I suspect it's probably more than "several decades" Andrew...
                ... unless there's something you're not telling us of course!!

                Comment

                • colin m
                  Moderator
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 8741
                  • Colin
                  • Stafford, UK

                  #9
                  Thanks for stopping by chaps,

                  Originally posted by Ian M
                  once you start to look into all the nooks and crannies, it shows its age
                  Back in 1980 it was probably quite something. But these days..... I mean, did you see the original seats?
                  Originally posted by The Smythe Meister
                  and it's got Shark's teeth!!
                  And who doesn't like a sharks mouth?
                  Originally posted by The Smythe Meister
                  all to make just 39 of em!!....
                  That's just the FAW22, a few more were made of earlier versions.

                  Comment

                  • JR
                    • May 2015
                    • 18273

                    #10
                    Colin do planes normally have that length of life in the service from 1951 to 197O ! I know the Dakota does , but surely that's an exception.

                    The Committee would like to award you

                    Nice build , congratulations.
                    Attached Files

                    Comment

                    • colin m
                      Moderator
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 8741
                      • Colin
                      • Stafford, UK

                      #11
                      Originally posted by John Race
                      Colin do planes normally have that length of life in the service from 1951 to 197O ! I know the Dakota does , but surely that's an exception.

                      The Committee would like to award you
                      [ATTACH alt="2020DB.jpg"]474522[/ATTACH]
                      Nice build , congratulations.
                      Yes John, the Sea Venom wasn’t particularly well known, maybe that’s why we’re a bit surprised at its length of service. However, the Sea Venom was still an active aircraft in 1970, but was a second line aircraft at this time.
                      And the award, I’m humbled.

                      Comment

                      • flyjoe180
                        SMF Supporters
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 12397
                        • Joe
                        • Earth

                        #12
                        Lovely result Collin, enjoyed watching the build too

                        Comment

                        • Airborne01
                          • Mar 2021
                          • 3968
                          • Steve
                          • Essex

                          #13
                          Sad ending though :anguished:
                          Steve

                          Comment

                          • colin m
                            Moderator
                            • Dec 2008
                            • 8741
                            • Colin
                            • Stafford, UK

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Airborne01
                            Sad ending though
                            A very sad ending, which makes me wonder why the kit manufacturer chose this aircraft. Surly at least one Sea Venom did something interesting in its life. That would have been a better subject.

                            Comment

                            • colin m
                              Moderator
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 8741
                              • Colin
                              • Stafford, UK

                              #15
                              Originally posted by flyjoe180
                              enjoyed watching the build too
                              Cheers Joe. It was an OK build, no real drama.

                              Comment

                              Working...