Morning gents!
Firstly, I hope you all had a good Christmas day and Father Christmas got you wanted (Waspie - excepted).
Secondly, thank you all for the very generous comments. Coming from such a talented bunch as yourselves it it is very much appreciated!!
JR - Yet again I am truly humbled!! Please pass my thanks onto the committee. I am truly honoured! I hope that the fact that the committee spokesman i.e. your good self, happens to be a complete Soviet WWII nut is purely coincidence!?!?
:smiling5:
yak face - Tony, given that you're a confirmed Soviet Wingy nut and have 'Yak' in your user name, I will take that as a real compliment. The Raiden really is fat isn't it? It had a radial engine which of of course often leads towards a chunkier look than an in-line engine - P-47 vs P-51 being an obvious example. However, I seem to recall reading when doing my research that the Raiden's engine had a particularly large diameter even for a radial engine.
Thanks again chaps, your support is most appreciated.
Yours
Andrew
Firstly, I hope you all had a good Christmas day and Father Christmas got you wanted (Waspie - excepted).
Secondly, thank you all for the very generous comments. Coming from such a talented bunch as yourselves it it is very much appreciated!!
JR - Yet again I am truly humbled!! Please pass my thanks onto the committee. I am truly honoured! I hope that the fact that the committee spokesman i.e. your good self, happens to be a complete Soviet WWII nut is purely coincidence!?!?

yak face - Tony, given that you're a confirmed Soviet Wingy nut and have 'Yak' in your user name, I will take that as a real compliment. The Raiden really is fat isn't it? It had a radial engine which of of course often leads towards a chunkier look than an in-line engine - P-47 vs P-51 being an obvious example. However, I seem to recall reading when doing my research that the Raiden's engine had a particularly large diameter even for a radial engine.
Thanks again chaps, your support is most appreciated.
Yours
Andrew
Comment