That theory stems from a famous piece of colour film,very early,the upper camouflage is still 70/71. In the film a mechanic fits a slat and the underside (inside) colour OF THE SLAT is arguably RLM 65.
I've looked at a lot of photos of Bf109s throughout the war,in the vast majority the area beneath the slat is not visible,partly because the crews tended to push them back in,partly because upper wing surfaces are rarely see in photographs taken by a person of normal height. Luckily for us the Luftwaffe quite often took pictures of aircraft they had managed to crash,and we took photos of the ones we shot down. Because these are either stood on their noses or lie on their bellies (assuming the crash wasn't the type that left a smoking hole in the ground) and because the slats have often deployed that area is visible. It is usually in RLM 02 or the camouflage colour. I'm not saying RLM 65 is impossible,nothing is,just that the weight of evidence supports one of the other options better.
Cheers
Steve
I've looked at a lot of photos of Bf109s throughout the war,in the vast majority the area beneath the slat is not visible,partly because the crews tended to push them back in,partly because upper wing surfaces are rarely see in photographs taken by a person of normal height. Luckily for us the Luftwaffe quite often took pictures of aircraft they had managed to crash,and we took photos of the ones we shot down. Because these are either stood on their noses or lie on their bellies (assuming the crash wasn't the type that left a smoking hole in the ground) and because the slats have often deployed that area is visible. It is usually in RLM 02 or the camouflage colour. I'm not saying RLM 65 is impossible,nothing is,just that the weight of evidence supports one of the other options better.
Cheers
Steve
Comment