Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Revell 1/48 Mistel

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stona
    SMF Supporters
    • Jul 2008
    • 9889

    #16
    A short history of composite aircraft potted, without writing a book, I can't possibly include everything!


    The origins of the concept lie in the need to increase range. The very earliest were airships carrying a 'heavier than air' aircraft. The British tried this with a Sea Scout airship and BE.2c Fighter.


    Soon combinations of two aircraft were being tried. By 1937 the British were testing the Short-Mayo composite, named after Robert Mayo then of British Imperial Airways,comprised of a lower S.21 flying boat (Maia) and an upper Short S.20 float plane (Mercury). Mayo's combination was a solution to the problem of carrying mail quickly between Britain and North America.The concept was not pursued by the British though it did appear again early in the war before being finally abandoned by Portal in May 1942.


    It was the Germans who developed the 'Mistel method of towing' initially with a glider attached to and below a powered aircraft. Early examples were composed of a Kl 35 aircraft above a DFS 23 glider, later a Bf 109 E was fitted above the same type of glider.


    Once war was declared the eventual method by which the Mistel concept would be employed was a combination of the composite aircraft concept and the ideas of a certain Siegfried Holzbauer about delivering large bombs (literally Grossebombe) on British ships. He imagined a jet powered combination with the smaller aircraft embedded into the lower bomb, but the concepts are not dissimilar.


    This led to work on the first offensive Mistel combination, the project was code named 'Beethoven', which would comprise a Bf 109 F and Ju 88 A-4. The Germans developed sophisticated control circuits and fitted auto-pilots as well as developing huge and powerful war heads. These were not simply a large bomb.The Mistel warhead, Schwere Holladung (SHL) 3500 contained 1,700 Kg of explosive in a hollow charge and was a sophisticated design for sinking ships or blow open reinforced concrete walls as found on command bunkers and heavy gun emplacements as well as to destroy factories and other industrial targets. The assembled Mistel was actually called a Beethoven-Gerat (Beethoven device).


    The initial attack using the new system was to have been made on Scapa Flow.


    I can't go into the various testing and operations of this weapon, suffice to say it didn't work as well as expected.


    There were several types of 'Mistel' actually built and flown operationally. The Mistel 1 was the most numerous.


    Mistel 1 was a Bf 109 F and Ju 88 A combination.


    Mistel S1 was a Bf 109 G and Ju 88 C combination


    Mistel S2 was a Fw 190 A and Ju 88 G combination.


    Specifically the Fw 190/Ta 154 combination as can be built from this kit.


    It was the RLM that asked Focke-Wulf to look into this in July 1944 following the appearance of the first Junkers built Mistel 1s. The Ta 154 had not met expectations and was on the verge of cancellation, so Focke-Wulf jumped at the chance to save the contract, albeit in somewhat modified form. Focke-Wulf drawings for a warhead carrying Mistel combination date from mid July 1944. It is unlikely that any of these were completed, so building the version with a warhead may be verging on a what if.


    There are however other drawings of a Fw 190/Ta 154 Mistel described as a 'Sprengstofftrager' or explosives carrier. This is the version intended for use against bomber formations and comprised a Fw 190 and Ta 154, the latter without the warhead but simply packed with explosives. The explosives would be detonated by the pilot of the separated Fw 190 controlling aircraft at what he deemed the appropriate time. Some sources suggest that six of this version were completed and test flown at Eschwege. Whether any were used operationally is not known.


    There were all sorts of weird and wonderful Mistels proposed, from a double Me 262 to a Bf 109/Fi 103 (V1) and many more, but they were never built.


    Cheers


    Steve

    Comment

    • Guest

      #17
      See, told you he would


      Many thanks Steve.

      Comment

      • Guest

        #18
        I have the same kit in my stash which was being sold off in 'cheap' book store . It was bought because I have built the TA154 and thoroughly enjoyed the build. Kit went together very well as I recall but the wings sagged very badly. I used section of 10swg piano wire to act a straightener/stiffener.

        Comment

        • stona
          SMF Supporters
          • Jul 2008
          • 9889

          #19
          No worries, since you mentioned range, which was the original impetus behind the early British and German efforts, I should add that some of the late war German designs were also about increased range. One example for an ultra long range pathfinder (fuhrungsmaschine) would have comprised a Fw 190 A-8 and Ju 88 H-4 (a stretched Ju 88 G-1 carrying much more fuel, designed as a long range zerstorer). The composite would have carried well over 10,000 litres of fuel, though its not clear where the Germans would have found this at a time when most of the Luftwaffe was effectively grounded by a lack of fuel. It was yet another project that never got off paper.


          Cheers


          Steve

          Comment

          • Gern
            SMF Supporters
            • May 2009
            • 9211

            #20
            Originally posted by \
            Anything interesting near the top of the pile Dave?
            The build that Peter started, see post #5 above, shows that there is some issues. This is hardly surprising for an ageing Monogram kit but, by all accounts, for a simple build, the FW is supposed to be quite good in shape etc. Main thing is wing fit but it won't be the only kit that needs work on the wings......


            I am almost tempted to build the TA as a whole aircraft, all the bits are there I believe just a bit sparse on the instructions.
            If you do want to build the Ta I have the stand-alone kit and could send a copy of the instructions. PM your address if you're interested.

            Comment

            • Guest

              #21
              Originally posted by \
              If you do want to build the Ta I have the stand-alone kit and could send a copy of the instructions. PM your address if you're interested.
              Like you Dave, mine is down the to do list but the more I think about it the more I think I will build it as a Mistel. Thanks for the offer though, I will keep it in mind if I change my mind.

              Comment

              • colin m
                Moderator
                • Dec 2008
                • 8740
                • Colin
                • Stafford, UK

                #22
                Originally posted by \
                A short history of composite aircraft potted
                Thanks Steve, brilliant.


                I've said before, the Germans during WW2 were certainly great engineers (and probably still are too)


                Colin M..

                Comment

                Working...