I've have some production figures...somewhere.
The number of airframes is not always the best measure, that being airframe weight, which accounts for building heavier aircraft (meaning primarily bombers and/or transports). Without looking I'm sure that the UK out-produced Germany in 1940.
Somewhere, on one of my shelves, is a book containing that information. The problem is I don't remember which one :smiling3:
What is certain is that the Luftwaffe started Barbarossa with only slightly more total aircraft than it started operations in the West in May 1940 (4,882 to 4,782). Crucially it had 200 fewer bombers in June 1941 (1,511 to 1,711) and FAR fewer twin engine fighters, principally the Bf 110, which proved a very useful aircraft in the East (188 to 354). It had never come close to making up the losses of these types.
The number of airframes is not always the best measure, that being airframe weight, which accounts for building heavier aircraft (meaning primarily bombers and/or transports). Without looking I'm sure that the UK out-produced Germany in 1940.
Somewhere, on one of my shelves, is a book containing that information. The problem is I don't remember which one :smiling3:
What is certain is that the Luftwaffe started Barbarossa with only slightly more total aircraft than it started operations in the West in May 1940 (4,882 to 4,782). Crucially it had 200 fewer bombers in June 1941 (1,511 to 1,711) and FAR fewer twin engine fighters, principally the Bf 110, which proved a very useful aircraft in the East (188 to 354). It had never come close to making up the losses of these types.
Comment