If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If it is a fairly old kit you may have a few issues but with a bit of patience and care, mixed in with lots of dry fitting and touching up, they make good kits. A builders build rather than a 'shake & make' like Tamiya... whoops, not that I am saying Tamiya kits are too easy.... I will shut up before I dig myself too big a hole....
I only remember making one,it was a large scale P-51. I've been to see if it's still in my loft but sadly I suspect it has found its way to model Nirvana.
I paid quite a lot for it and remember it being quite a challenging build,but it was one of the first models I made after I came back to the hobby. I remember the undercarriage was supposed to go up and down (eat your hearts out Tamiya!) but it didn't work too well on mine.
I suspect it was one of those models that kept unopened would be worth a bit on evil bay today.
I've got a Monogram DC3 in the cupboard which I've eyed suspiciously from time to time. I've heard bad things about it but it looks okay to me. I think Graham's right,some of the old kits need a bit of work but can make very nice models.
A lot of Revell's current output are reboxed Monogram kits, and for good reason - they are still selling in their current state. as far as I recall, there are a few - not many - proper DOGS out there, but for the most part, as mentioned above, are still very decent kits to get working on as long as you're not expecting it to fall together.
Apparently the B-24 has quite a few shape issues, but the B-17F and G are good kits. In fact the only one I've been proper warned off has been the P-47N in 1:48 scale.
Hi mike, as stuart says alot of the old monogram kits are quite good and still being released under revells name, but there are a few really old ones that are quite a challenge (ie. the fw 190 i did for the spring GB!) The main thing about the monogram kits is that they usually have raised panel lines and the fit of the parts sometimes needs a bit of fettling but in their day the level of detail and choice of subjects were regarded as very good, the larger 1/48 kits in particular having good interior detail and features like detailed gun bays and exposed engines. Which kit is it youre considering, maybe someone will have had first hand experience or at least seen one in the box? cheers tony
Thanks guys, it's a moot point now as I didn't win it, I wasn't prepared to pay the same as the winning bidder.
It was an old Hawker Typhoon kit in (i think) 1:48 scale, the box said 1/4? I seem to remember reading something about old labelling for size and 1/4 being 1:48 and 1/8 being 1:72, maybe I just dreamed it though, who knows,
The Typhoons another of those aircraft I always liked the look of, (I used to thing of the intake at the front as a big mouth)
HI mike , if it was an old USA boxing it could have had the scale as 1/4 , (1/4 inch to one foot) In which case it would be quite an old mould (like my fw 190 -circa 1974) and probably one of the dogs we were on about so maybe its no bad thing you didnt win it!!! Cheers tony
Weeeell, as it happens I stumbled across a couple of 1:72 scale Academy kits.
Hawker Typhoon Mk1B and a Hawker Tempest V for a bargain price so i'm quite happy with those, especially one of each as I can model them side by side displaying the differences.
I think this'll be the first bash at Academy kits too.
Nice one, in my experience of academy kits theyve always been great- good detail, excellent fit and decals and great value too.Looking forward to seeing them, cheers tony
I like Academy kits on the whole. I've built two of them now (B-17F and the GB Stuka). Only thing i've noticed with both builds is the fragile decals. But maybe i've just been unlucky. Other then that they've gone together good.
Comment