Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Red 163?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    #1

    Red 163?

    Hi. I am building the Academy 1/72 ME 163 and the decals for the single seater are white 26 of 1/jg 400 and white 14 of same sqn.

    Would either of these planes ever have been painted in the tomato red some 163's were?

    Thanx

    Theuns
  • stona
    SMF Supporters
    • Jul 2008
    • 9889

    #2
    I don't think so Theuns. I will be able to look them up tomorrow and let you know for sure. I have a vague recollection of White 26 in late war colours.

    Cheers

    Steve

    Comment

    • Guest

      #3
      Thanx Steve. I will have to come up with decals for PK#QL as acordong to google it was painted red ,but only for one flight!

      RLM 23 ROT seems to be about "tomato red"

      Theuns

      Comment

      • stona
        SMF Supporters
        • Jul 2008
        • 9889

        #4
        Spate certainly maintained that he made a flight in a red painted Komet though no other evidence exists. We'll have to take his word for it. It makes an interesting subject. I suspect the red would have been RLM 23.

        There is an interesting story about an orange Ta 152. On 22nd March 1945 Obstlt.Fritz Auffhammer (Kommodore JG 301) was to return a Ta 152 he had been evaluating to Rechlin,and meet with various Focke-Wulf personnel. Nervous of flying a new fighter over the trigger happy Luftwaffe flak crews he ordered it painted orange for the flight. Many people have doubted this story,but in September 2001 Jerry Crandall had both Auffhammer and Hptm. Roderich Cescotti,who flew his own Fw 190 D-9 (Green 1) as Auffhammer's wing man, sign a document confirming the flight. Crandall offered the two men various orange colours as possibilities and they both agreed on a reddish mix of RLM 23 and RLM 04.

        Cheers

        Steve

        Comment

        • Guest

          #5
          I have read that the red paint weighed 40 Lb. It seems a bit on the much side, but maybe it was lead based LOL!

          Tamiya Gloss red as a base for decals.

          Theuns

          [ATTACH]48971.IPB[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH]48972.IPB[/ATTACH]

          [ATTACH]48973.IPB[/ATTACH]





          Comment

          • stona
            SMF Supporters
            • Jul 2008
            • 9889

            #6
            40lb sounds a lot on such a small aircraft. I've seen estimates for the weight of paint on a B-17 between 200lbs and 600lbs. I've no idea which is more accurate.

            Cheers

            Steve

            Comment

            • Guest

              #7
              Well ,to give you an idea the Hunter T58 I re-sprayed took about 18 liters of paint (un mixed so more like 30 odd liters or so.

              I recon it must weigh about 22-25kg (say 55 lbs) So lets say arround 8 times the surface area could be close to 450 lbs.

              Maybe modern epoxy paints are lighter than the old paints.

              From what you see in the pic, does it look alomst like RLM 23?

              Theuns

              Comment

              • stona
                SMF Supporters
                • Jul 2008
                • 9889

                #8
                The "Ikarol" laquers used by German manufacturers during the war were resin based coatings,hence no need for undercoats or primers. They were designed to be applied directly to the light alloys used in aircraft skins.

                The colour in your photo looks a lot like RLM 23 to me,certainly well within the ball park for scale model work.

                Cheers

                Steve

                Comment

                • Guest

                  #9
                  Ok thanx steve. Stayed tuned for final pix soon.

                  I don't know if I have asked you before Steve, do you know where I can find pix of the ME 262 in USAF captured markings, or even I recall one in bare metal>

                  Theuns

                  Comment

                  • stona
                    SMF Supporters
                    • Jul 2008
                    • 9889

                    #10
                    The Americans only took four Me 163s,FE numbers 500-503. They were less interested than the British who took twenty! I have a picture of W.Nr 191301,which became FE 500 (later T2 500) at the AAF Fair at Wright Field in October 1945 and it still carries its Luftwaffe markings. I also have a picture of the same aircraft with its later US number (T-2-500) on the fin,taken at Muroc Flight Test Base during flight trials in 1946. It never made a powered flight in the US but was towed behind a B-29. It still carries its original,Luftwaffe markings.

                    FE 501 and FE 502 were scrapped at Freeman Field in 1946. I don't know if they ever got US markings. FE 503 went to Bell Aircraft in November 1946 and its fate is unknown.

                    Oddly I also have a picture of W.Nr 191454,numbered "Air Min 204" by the British,on display in Hyde Park during September 1945 and it too retains its original Luftwaffe markings!

                    I'd be surprised to see a natural metal example. Even the prototypes were painted grey. There are quite a few non metal components too. Are you sure you haven't seen a photo of one of the wooden mock ups that were built?

                    Cheers

                    Steve

                    Comment

                    • Guest

                      #11
                      Hey Steve , most interesting as usual!

                      I was actually refering to the ME 262 Jet as being in USAF markings after the war. I might heve confused the grey for bare metal on the 262 bit it was only one colour with something sprayed over all the lap joints (maybe the Germans did full size pre-shading LOL!)

                      Thanx

                      Theuns

                      Comment

                      • stona
                        SMF Supporters
                        • Jul 2008
                        • 9889

                        #12
                        Originally posted by \
                        I might heve confused the grey for bare metal on the 262 bit it was only one colour with something sprayed over all the lap joints Theuns
                        I know the one you mean now. That 262 was captured like that. The joints were all puttied and sanded before painting but that one never got painted. You can see the putty over the joins. Not unusual at war's end.

                        I think this is the one you are thinking of.

                        It flew in the US but retained Luftwaffe markings.

                        Here's my version. I went for grey putty,but if I did it again I'd go for a red/brown colour.

                        Cheers

                        Steve

                        Comment

                        • Guest

                          #13
                          Oh I see now. I confused the bare metal one with what I thought had USAF markings on (must be all the glue fumes!)

                          I like your 262, very interesting. Would a bomber version ever look like this, or was it only the last few fighters that were not painted?

                          One might even spray the model and then brush paint the "putty lines" on as they seem to be slightly "un-neat" in the full size pix if you understand what I am getting at.

                          A red-brown you say???

                          Theuns

                          Comment

                          • stona
                            SMF Supporters
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 9889

                            #14
                            I'd have to check the production schedule to see what was being built at the end,but theoretically any version could have ended up like that.

                            There seems to be a popular idea that the putty was a red/brown or yellow colour nowadays but I've not seen any solid evidence to back that up. Some,for example in the nose cone of the one you have in SA, looks almost white to me. I think you can take your pick really.

                            Cheers

                            Steve

                            Comment

                            • Guest

                              #15
                              This putty colour scenario got me interested in a weird "lets investigate coz i'm bored" way (probably just to see if i could suss it really i suppose)

                              This is sort of a tenuous offering but ....

                              I found a site where they had a german plane in for restoration (a blog on the NASM website)

                              Here they say that the plane (mostly laminated wood in this case) was filled with WOOD putty .... now going on a past vocation where i had to take a course in French polishing, the oil contributive to early European wood filler and putty was Cold Processed Linseed and/or Flaxseed oil which are a dirty brown colour....making the filler a light brown/tan when in putty form.

                              ....could be / possibly / maybe feasible?

                              Comment

                              Working...