Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Pacific Carrier War GB

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ian M
    Administrator
    • Dec 2008
    • 18271
    • Ian
    • Falster, Denmark

    #16
    Early days yet Karl. Give it time and add me to the list. Sure I can find a victim for this one...
    Group builds

    Bismarck

    Comment

    • KarlW
      • Jul 2020
      • 1522

      #17
      So now we have;
      Myself
      Tim Marlow
      The Smythe Meister
      Geoffers
      Valeron
      langy71
      Lee Drennen
      Ian M

      Hoping for some floaty thing to sail in, I suspect it's all aircraft so far.

      Comment

      • stillp
        SMF Supporters
        • Nov 2016
        • 8096
        • Pete
        • Rugby

        #18
        Would a P47D qualify?
        Pete

        Comment

        • KarlW
          • Jul 2020
          • 1522

          #19
          Originally posted by stillp
          Would a P47D qualify?
          Pete
          While I love the Jug they didn't fly off carriers.

          Comment

          • KarlW
            • Jul 2020
            • 1522

            #20
            Originally posted by stillp
            Would a P47D qualify?
            Pete
            Actually, some were being ferried on the USS Manilla bay and 4 were used to defend the ship when attacked off Saipan, so yes, but I would say it would have to carry the appropriate markings.
            After loading 37 Army Republic P-47 Thunderbolts of the Army Air Forces' 73rd Fighter Squadron, 318th Fighter Group, Manila Bay sailed on 5 June for the Mariana Islands. Steaming via Eniwetok, she reached the eastern approaches to Saipan on 19 June. During the next 4 days, she remained east of the embattled island as ships and planes of the Fast Carrier Task Force repulsed the Japanese Fleet in the Battle of the Philippine Sea, and inflicted staggering losses on the enemy, crippling the Imperial Navy’s air strength permanently.

            On 23 June, Manila Bay came under enemy air attack during refueling operations east of Saipan. Four Aichi D3A Val dive bombers attacked her from dead ahead, dropping their bombs which exploded wide to port. As a precautionary and rather unusual move which Raymond A. Spruance later characterized as "commendable initiative", Manila Bay launched four of the P-47 Thunderbolts she was ferrying to fly protective CAP until radar screens were clear of contacts. The Army fighters then flew to Saipan, their intended destination. Manila Bay launched the remaining planes the next day and returned to Eniwetok, arriving on 27 June. After embarking 207 wounded troops, she departed on 1 July, touched Pearl Harbor on the 8th, and reached San Diego on 16 July.

            Comment

            • spanner570
              SMF Supporters
              • May 2009
              • 15427

              #21
              They were transported by U.S. escort carriers, then flew off to their required airfield destinations. However, they could not land back on a carrier......

              I've just found a 1/72 B-25 Bomber in a box in the loft, so I could well be in. I write "Could well be" because the markings are probably incorrect for the Far East theatre. I'll have to check. If they are wrong, I'll have to re- think.

              Comment

              • KarlW
                • Jul 2020
                • 1522

                #22
                Originally posted by spanner570
                They were transported by U.S. escort carriers, then flew off to their required airfield destinations. However, they could not land back on a carrier......

                I've just found a 1/72 B-25 Bomber in a box in the loft, so I could well be in. I write "Could well be" because the markings are probably incorrect for the Far East theatre. I'll have to check. If they are wrong, I'll have to re- think.
                Maybe I should of more correctly say "fight off carriers", apart from the 4 that flew CAP as detailed above. And as I would certainly allow the Doolittle raiders I feel I would have to include those 4.........

                Comment

                • spanner570
                  SMF Supporters
                  • May 2009
                  • 15427

                  #23
                  The B-25 fought off a carrier and bombed Tokyo!

                  Any road up, not to worry, I'll look for summat else. :thumb2:

                  Comment

                  • KarlW
                    • Jul 2020
                    • 1522

                    #24
                    Originally posted by spanner570
                    The B-25 fought off a carrier and bombed Tokyo!

                    Any road up, not to worry, I'll look for summat else. :thumb2:
                    They're allowed, see above.

                    Comment

                    • Lee Drennen
                      SMF Supporters
                      • Apr 2018
                      • 7711

                      #25
                      Originally posted by spanner570
                      The B-25 fought off a carrier
                      They bare got off of them but they did bet it was a scary takeoff lol.

                      Comment

                      • KarlW
                        • Jul 2020
                        • 1522

                        #26
                        Originally posted by Lee Drennen
                        They bare got off of them but they did bet it was a scary takeoff lol.
                        I bet the whole thing was sphincter testing.
                        "Take off from this moving, too short airfield, fly in a straight line with no deviations, one bombing pass, then land on fumes."

                        Comment

                        • Ian M
                          Administrator
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 18271
                          • Ian
                          • Falster, Denmark

                          #27
                          This might just be me but I am thinking that this is going to be 99.9% aircraft builds in this GB. Maybe a more apt title could be the Aircraft of the Pacific War. I think it might open it up more than it would close it in...
                          Group builds

                          Bismarck

                          Comment

                          • spanner570
                            SMF Supporters
                            • May 2009
                            • 15427

                            #28
                            Don't suggest that Ian. I have a cunning plan.......

                            EDIT
                            'Cunning plan' bought.

                            Karl, providing the G.B. title doesn't change to 'Aircraft of the Pacific War' I'm in.....

                            Cheers.
                            Ron

                            Comment

                            • Lee Drennen
                              SMF Supporters
                              • Apr 2018
                              • 7711

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Ian M
                              Maybe a more apt title could be the Aircraft of the Pacific War.
                              I’m with Ron I think you should leave it alone you may discourage Karl altogether by messing with his GB suggestion and he may drop the whole thing. I think it’s fine the way it is. Besides the Aircraft that was in the Pacific Theater were on a Carrier at one time or another.

                              Comment

                              • Guest

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Lee Drennen
                                the Aircraft that was in the Pacific Theater were on a Carrier at one time or another.
                                Eh … are you sure? For “Aircraft in the Pacific” I could build, say, the Revell (ex-Matchbox) PB4Y-2 Privateer I have in my stash, or a Hawker Hurricane with Dutch flags on it. Not sure those would fit the “Pacific Carrier War” theme

                                Comment

                                Working...