Jakko’s 1:35 Dragon Sd.Kfz. 251

[Guest]

My entry is going to be one if Dragon’s German Sd.Kfz. 251 half-tracks:

[ATTACH]462155[/ATTACH]

I bought this kit second-hand earlier this year because while building an Sd.Kfz. 7, I felt like adding another of this general type of half-track to my collection, and someone happened to offer one for sale.

It’s a three-in-one kit, which is kind of true, but like most of those claims, only just … The three choices are a Sd.Kfz. 251/1, which is the basic APC; a 251/1 with infrared night-fighting gear, which I think wasn’t ever actually used during the war; or a late-model 251/9, which has a short-barrelled 7.5 cm gun for infantry support mounted on the top of the fighting compartment. I make that two-in-one, with one of the two having a further option The basic vehicle is an Ausführung D, the final production variant of the Sd.Kfz. 251 that is easily recognisable by the way its rear slopes outward all the way — earlier variants had the top half slope inward — and the stowage lockers on the sides being apparently integrated into the hull instead of being separate boxes on the mudguards. The /9 is a late model because the gun sits on top of the hull instead of lower, in a recess cut in the front plate (Tamiya makes that one, BTW).

Anyway, the side of the box promises all kinds of extras as well:

[ATTACH]462156[/ATTACH]

The instructions are available on Scalemates, so I’m not going to post them here. The rest of the box contents are:

[ATTACH]462157[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462158[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462159[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462160[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462161[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462162[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462163[/ATTACH]

Here are the extras:

[ATTACH]462164[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462165[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462166[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462167[/ATTACH]

There are two sets of tracks: the original type is on the sprues with the wheels, while the bags have the simplified type that was used late in the war. Note the turned aluminium barrel and the three brass 7.5 cm rounds. The driver figure is in soft plastic, that seems to deform quite easily, but maybe it helps to get him with his hands on the wheel?

I’m not quite sure yet how I’m going to finish this one, but I do know it won’t be as a /9 or with the infrared gear. The parts for those two are in my German vehicles spares box already

[Gern]

Welcome aboard Jakko. Looks like you got enough parts to keep you occupied for a while.

[Jim R]

Lots of parts Jakko. I suppose many will be destined for the spares box depending on what you build. Looking forward to the build.

[Allen Dewire]

I'm in for this Jakko and that is a nice kit. I'm using the /9 parts for my conversion of the Tamiya D kit. The I/R version was used late in the war and was known as the "Falke" and some supported the I/R equipped Panthers. Prob was the I/R equipment on the Panther only had a range out to 500 meters, hence the introduction of the "UHU", giving an increase out to 1500 meters. Too little, too late as the old story goes.....Have fun with it and don't let the interior inaccuracies get you down.........

Prost
Allen

[Guest]

Looks like you got enough parts to keep you occupied for a while.

Actually, it doesn’t appear to be too bad. Sure, those track links and plenty of wheels, but other than that it seems a fairly straightforward kit. I don’t intend to do major rebuilding/conversion/surgery on it, which should help

I suppose many will be destined for the spares box depending on what you build.

I already put some of the sprues in there

The I/R version was used late in the war and was known as the "Falke" and some supported the I/R equipped Panthers. Prob was the I/R equipment on the Panther only had a range out to 500 meters, hence the introduction of the "UHU", giving an increase out to 1500 meters.

Are you thinking of the 251/20 with the big IR spotlight?

[ATTACH]462187[/ATTACH]

That’s not what’s in this kit, else I might just have gone for that However, looking for a picture like the one above, I found this:

[ATTACH]462188[/ATTACH]

So it looks like the night-fighting variant was actually used, and not just “Wehrmacht 1946” as I thought it was.

don't let the interior inaccuracies get you down.........

Which inaccuracies are those?

[Allen Dewire]

Are you thinking of the 251/20 with the big IR spotlight?



That’s not what’s in this kit, else I might just have gone for that :smiling3: However, looking for a picture like the one above, I found this:

That's the UHU Jakko, and It has the same designation as the Falke in the second pic. AfV Club make a good kit of the UHU, but it's incomplete (no generator, etc.). Unfortunately, Dragon got some details on their 251 Ausf. D series of kits wrong. Both inside and on the outside too. If you go to Terry Ashley's site, PMMS, you can read through his reviews of the Dragon D kits. Inside, the transmission hump is too small, for one. There are others and then on to the outside, including the roadwheels, drive sprocket teeth offset and so on. Worth a read if you are going for accuracy in your build...Most of all, just have fun!!!

Prost
Allen

[Steve Jones]

Scottie did one a while back. He may have some useful info for you

[Guest]

That's the UHU Jakko, and It has the same designation as the Falke in the second pic.

Yeah, I got confused In any case they’re not relevant as I will build neither here

Unfortunately, Dragon got some details on their 251 Ausf. D series of kits wrong. Both inside and on the outside too. If you go to Terry Ashley's site, PMMS, you can read through his reviews of the Dragon D kits. Inside, the transmission hump is too small, for one. There are others and then on to the outside, including the roadwheels, drive sprocket teeth offset and so on.

I did a little research after your remark about the problems, and came across a review on Armorama:

Dragon has fixed the problem of the floor. Before, the transmission hump was too small and there were tabs for putting a water tank in (only used in the ambulance version of the 251). Now the transmission hump is the correct size and shape.

… but I haven’t checked if my kit has the corrected parts or not.

It also shows other issues, some of which are going to have to be corrected, yes.

[stillp]

This was at Tank, Trucks, and Firepower last week:

Pete

[Guest]

Thanks, though unfortunately, that’s (almost certainly) not an Sd.Kfz. 251 but an OT-810 converted to look like one

The OT-810 is the Czechoslovakian improved version of the 251, built after the war and used into the 1970s by the Czechoslovakian army, with a diesel engine and a roof over the troop compartment, in addition to detail changes. From the 1990s on, a lot of these became available to collectors, and the vast majority of those cut out the roof and made other visual changes to turn them into Sd.Kfz. 251-replicas. Some of the more obvious differences are the headlights, the muffler (flat on the OT-810 vs. an upright cylinder on the Sd.Kfz. 251) and the flaps for the driver’s vision ports. However, the best giveaway is the running gear: the track has a shorter pitch and the drive sprocket has teeth instead of rollers. This vehicle’s tracks have rubber pads added that gives more of a 251 appearance, but the tracks normally look like this:

[ATTACH]462231[/ATTACH][ATTACH]462230[/ATTACH]

This is an OT-810 that I photographed at IWM Duxford twenty years ago.

A long time ago, on another forum someone asked, IIRC, “My father just bought an OT-810, which colours should we paint it?” — with the clear meaning of Which German camouflage pattern and markings will look good on it? My reply was, “Czechoslovakian military green, with 1960s markings.” He didn’t even reply to that … Really, these vehicles are like DeLoreans: there are more converted ones than originals left, probably.

[Guest]

It took me a while to decide how to finish the model, as that would likely affect whether I would need to make any modifications to it. The bog-standard German three-colour or winter camo doesn’t appeal to me — everybody does that already, so there must be something more interesting you can do with a 251. After some research, I found these pictures, among others:

A British-captured one in Normandy, most likely a 251/8 ambulance, repainted in (probably) SCC 15 olive drab:

[ATTACH]462660[/ATTACH]

A Polish-captured vehicle in Italy, again probably in SCC 15 and with full, standard British Army markings:

[ATTACH]462661[/ATTACH]

Note the missing driver’s visors and the dark yellow surrounds that produces, as well as having a cut-down Notek (black-out) light on both front mudguards to serve as normal headlights.

A Canadian-captured vehicle, probably a /1, in Normandy as well and again, probably painted SCC 15 and with Canadian Army markings:

[ATTACH]462662[/ATTACH]

American-captured /1s (probably) in the winter of 1944–45, prominently but very crudely marked to prevent friendly fire, but very dirty and not in great shape:

[ATTACH]462663[/ATTACH]

I’m not sure, but I think they’ve been repainted American olive drab as well, though I also saw models of these painted in German three-colour camo with the American markings added.

A French vehicle in Indochina, probably late 1940s:

[ATTACH]462659[/ATTACH]

Note the added grille on the front plate, and (barely visible) four exhausts for the cooling air on the sloping side panel to the engine bay. This vehicle was painted in an unknown colour, possibly American olive drab, but other options seem to be French post-1949 OD or even Japanese paint left over from the war. The T16 carrier alongside is probably American OD, but all you can really say about the 251 is that it appears to be a little paler, but that could just be faded paint and/or how it catches the light.

I eventually decided on that last one, because of the added interest of the tropical cooling system. That done, I started on the model yesterday, with the underside as per the instructions:

[ATTACH]462665[/ATTACH]

Though I deviated from Dragon’s instructions almost straight away because their order doesn’t make all that much sense at times. Also, there are mistakes in the instructions already here: C1 and C2 (the idler mounts) have been confused, so that where it says C1, you should use C2 and vice versa — the drawing is right, the caption for the part isn’t. The suspension arms are very difficult to line up straight: their locating pins are too loose and too short, so they can move not only up or down by accident but also the angle the axle makes to the hull side, seen from behind, may not be 90 degrees. Not all of mine are quite right, but it’s very hard to correct them.

Also, the shock absorbers on the last wheel arm have two problems. One is that Dragon would have you add them to the hull side before the arms themselves, which would make things almost impossible to line up. The second is that the instructions would have you glue the shock absorber’s lever to the outside of the tip of the connecting rod between that lever and the suspension arm. In the real world, there was a fork at the top of the connecting arm that the lever sat in (Dragon gives just the outside of that fork, and has you glue to lever to its outer face).

There are also a variety of things to add inside the underside, including what I think is the fuel tank, but all of these will be under the floor which has no removable panels (in the kit, anyway), so their inclusion is very puzzling. Needless to say, they won’t be fitted on my model.

I’m not sure yet about how to proceed: the instructions want you to add the floor first and then slide the hull sides into the gap this leaves between the floor and the underside. I’m leaning to fitting the sides first, though. I also haven’t decided what to do about the transmission hump, partly because I haven’t figured out yet how it’s too small

[Tim Marlow]

The usual excellent research going on here……..surprised the start of the build is so problematic though.

[Guest]

Well, problematic may be a big word, but they should have made the locating pins longer and fit more tightly in the holes in the lower side, that would have produced an instantly-square suspension. Everything seems to have slightly too great tolerances, really: the bump stops above the arms, for example, have square pins and square holes, but you still need to make sure by eye that they’re actually straight and not twisted slightly.

I think what I need to do first is find out how much bigger that transmission hump is supposed to be. Going by googling a few photos, it seems too low in the kit, but I need to compare them better to make sure.

[Graeme C.]

Good research Jakko, Dragon's instructions don't always make sense.

[Allen Dewire]

Late evening Jakko,

Dragon destructions for the most part are a soup sandwich and I'm sure you know that. As for the tranny hump, if you have an AFV Club 251 Ausf. C or D in your stash, you can compare them and see how big the difference is. Personally, I wouldn't stress too much over it. I would throw one of Dragon's DS clothing jacket pieces over it and no one would be the wiser. If you do build the tropical version, I'm sure you could find something else to put on it. Even Terry (PMMS) said it would be difficult to correct this shortcoming in the Dragon kits. Just my thoughts. If you do build the tropical one, those slats on the front plate will be right up your alley and easy for you to create. Have fun!!!....

Prost
Allen