Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Steve's 1/72 Italeri Horsa Glider

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HAWKERHUNTER
    SMF Supporters
    • Feb 2012
    • 1618
    • Steve
    • Halifax, West Yorks.

    #16
    I will be following Steve. An iconic aircraft.
    Steve

    Comment

    • stona
      • Jul 2008
      • 9889

      #17
      Originally posted by colin m
      Then I read gliders weren't actually disposable, but could be recovered (assuming they survived the landing) everything started to make sense.
      This is true, but at least of the gliders that landed to take the Benouville and Ranville bridges, all were heavily damaged if not destroyed. Sgt. Jim Wallwork, the pilot of Howard's glider and my subject described his landing:

      "The final approach was a little fast and I landed probably at about 95[mph] instead of at 85, and 10 miles per hour in the dark looks rather quick. I hit the field and caught the first bit of wire and so I called "Stream," and by golly, it [the parachute] lifted the tail and forced the nose down. It drew us back and knocked the speed down tremendously. It was only on for two seconds, and "jettison," and Ainsworth pressed the tit and jettisoned the parachute. Then we were going along only about 60, which was ample to take me right into the corner. We got right into the corner of the field, the nose wheel had gone. The cockpit collapsed, and Ainsworth and I went right through the cockpit. I went over head first and landed flat on my stomach. I was stunned, as was Ainsworth; I came around and he seemed to be in bad shape. I said, "Can you crawl?" and he said, "No," and then I asked if I lifted, could he crawl out and he said, "I'll try". I lifted the thing and I felt that I lifted the whole bloody glider when probably all I lifted was a small spar, but I felt like 30 men when I picked this thing up and he did manage to crawl out."

      The front of Wallwork's glider was destroyed and it's amazing that both pilots got out alive.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	100760.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	4.0 KB
ID:	1228451

      That fence and gate was the boundary between the landing zone and the bridge, which was about 50m along the track in the foreground. They couldn't have landed any closer. It was a remarkable piece of flying. The other two gliders for this assault are visible in the background, and not far behind.

      Comment

      • spanner570
        SMF Supporters
        • May 2009
        • 15438

        #18
        Now that is a great reference for a dio. Steve! At least Wallwork had the good manners to leave the field gate intact!

        As usual with all your presentations, you just quietly get on with posting some great pictures and info. :thumb2:

        Ron

        Comment

        • stona
          • Jul 2008
          • 9889

          #19
          Originally posted by spanner570
          Now that is a great reference for a dio. Steve! At least Wallwork had the good manners to leave the field gate intact!
          I did contemplate doing the first glider (Wallwork/Ainsworth) as seen there - but discretion got the better part of valour.

          If someone did a dio with all three gliders in it, and there are quite a few photographs of these aircraft taken shortly after D-Day for reference, it would be magnificent, but huge! Even a 1/72 scale Horsa is a large model, as I have recently dicovered.

          Click image for larger version

Name:	Glider.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	4.7 KB
ID:	1228458

          Comment

          • Neil Merryweather
            SMF Supporters
            • Dec 2018
            • 5199
            • London

            #20
            Originally posted by stona
            Even a 1/72 scale Horsa is a large model, as I have recently dicovered.

            :fearful: I've got the Bronco 1-35 one in the stash.....

            Comment

            • stona
              • Jul 2008
              • 9889

              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Merryweather
              :fearful: I've got the Bronco 1-35 one in the stash.....
              I'm not sure where I'd put a model with a wingspan not far short of three feet!

              Comment

              • Neil Merryweather
                SMF Supporters
                • Dec 2018
                • 5199
                • London

                #22
                Originally posted by stona
                I'm not sure where I'd put a model with a wingspan not far short of three feet!
                Um...me too :tired:

                Comment

                • A_J_Rimmer
                  SMF Supporters
                  • May 2024
                  • 801
                  • Arnold
                  • North Wales

                  #23
                  Originally posted by stona
                  This is true, but at least of the gliders that landed to take the Benouville and Ranville bridges, all were heavily damaged if not destroyed. Sgt. Jim Wallwork, the pilot of Howard's glider and my subject described his landing:

                  "The final approach was a little fast and I landed probably at about 95[mph] instead of at 85, and 10 miles per hour in the dark looks rather quick. I hit the field and caught the first bit of wire and so I called "Stream," and by golly, it [the parachute] lifted the tail and forced the nose down. It drew us back and knocked the speed down tremendously. It was only on for two seconds, and "jettison," and Ainsworth pressed the tit and jettisoned the parachute. Then we were going along only about 60, which was ample to take me right into the corner. We got right into the corner of the field, the nose wheel had gone. The cockpit collapsed, and Ainsworth and I went right through the cockpit. I went over head first and landed flat on my stomach. I was stunned, as was Ainsworth; I came around and he seemed to be in bad shape. I said, "Can you crawl?" and he said, "No," and then I asked if I lifted, could he crawl out and he said, "I'll try". I lifted the thing and I felt that I lifted the whole bloody glider when probably all I lifted was a small spar, but I felt like 30 men when I picked this thing up and he did manage to crawl out."

                  The front of Wallwork's glider was destroyed and it's amazing that both pilots got out alive.

                  [ATTACH=CONFIG]n1228451[/ATTACH]

                  That fence and gate was the boundary between the landing zone and the bridge, which was about 50m along the track in the foreground. They couldn't have landed any closer. It was a remarkable piece of flying. The other two gliders for this assault are visible in the background, and not far behind.
                  Brave men.

                  Superb work thus far Steve.
                  Arnold Judas Rimmer BSc SSc

                  ''Happiness is a Triple Fried Egg Sandwich with Chilli Sauce and Chutney''

                  Comment

                  • scottie3158
                    SMF Supporters
                    • Apr 2018
                    • 14221
                    • Paul
                    • Holbeach

                    #24
                    Steve, looking good mate.

                    Comment

                    • stona
                      • Jul 2008
                      • 9889

                      #25
                      So, special markings, a.k.a. 'invasion stripes'.

                      First, the instructions get the ones on the wings much too far inboard, compared with the photographs of the actual gliders. Gliders were added to the list of aircraft to be marked with stripes after objections from the Commands that would operate them. They argued that since almost every other Allied aircraft except for night bombers would be marked, they should be too. They subsequently fell broadly under the same scheme as twin engine aircraft, though obviously thay had no engines, meaning the instruction for the stripes to begin outboard of the engines was rendered moot. They seem to have started inboard of the national marking (roundel) which was on no account to be obscured. Likewise, the fuselage stripes were applied starting at the base of the fin, not 18" from that position (as per instructions), and still ran right up to the fuselage roundel.

                      Second, if asked to paint black and white stripes on an aircraft would you really paint the black on areas that were already, to all intents and purposes, black? I find it unlikely that anyone on 4th of June, the eve of the original D-Day, would bother painting black over Night! There must be a good chance that the paint supplied was Night. The pictures don't tell the story, unfortunately.

                      Finally, these stripes were not expertly applied, something I have attempted to replicate. We'll see when I get the masking off

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Horsa-Gliders.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	4.6 KB
ID:	1228784

                      Comment

                      • rickoshea52
                        SMF Supporters
                        • Dec 2011
                        • 4076
                        • Rick

                        #26
                        Originally posted by stona


                        If someone did a dio with all three gliders in it, and there are quite a few photographs of these aircraft taken shortly after D-Day for reference, it would be magnificent, but huge! Even a 1/72 scale Horsa is a large model, as I have recently dicovered.

                        It’s been done. When the Airborne Forces Museum was at Browning barracks in Aldershot they had loads of dioramas including 1/72 scale recreations of not just the gliders and Pegasus Bridge but also the northern end of Arnhem Bridge from the Market Garden mission. As a boy I found it utterly fascinating and I’m sure it was a major factor in my taking up modelling.
                        On the bench: Airfix 1/48 Sea King HC4, Revell 1/24 Trabant.
                        Coming soon: Airfix 1/72 Phantom FGR2.
                        Just finished: Airfix 1/48 Stuka & Airfix 1/72 Sea King HC4.

                        Comment

                        • adt70hk
                          SMF Supporters
                          • Sep 2019
                          • 10428

                          #27
                          Originally posted by stona
                          So, special markings, a.k.a. 'invasion stripes'.

                          First, the instructions get the ones on the wings much too far inboard, compared with the photographs of the actual gliders. Gliders were added to the list of aircraft to be marked with stripes after objections from the Commands that would operate them. They argued that since almost every other Allied aircraft except for night bombers would be marked, they should be too. They subsequently fell broadly under the same scheme as twin engine aircraft, though obviously thay had no engines, meaning the instruction for the stripes to begin outboard of the engines was rendered moot. They seem to have started inboard of the national marking (roundel) which was on no account to be obscured. Likewise, the fuselage stripes were applied starting at the base of the fin, not 18" from that position (as per instructions), and still ran right up to the fuselage roundel.

                          Second, if asked to paint black and white stripes on an aircraft would you really paint the black on areas that were already, to all intents and purposes, black? I find it unlikely that anyone on 4th of June, the eve of the original D-Day, would bother painting black over Night! There must be a good chance that the paint supplied was Night. The pictures don't tell the story, unfortunately.

                          Finally, these stripes were not expertly applied, something I have attempted to replicate. We'll see when I get the masking off :smiling3:

                          [ATTACH=CONFIG]n1228784[/ATTACH]
                          Looking forward to the big reveal Steve.

                          Comment

                          • stona
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 9889

                            #28
                            Originally posted by adt70hk
                            Looking forward to the big reveal Steve.
                            I don't really have any references for the Horsa and strangely I can't find any drawings of the upper camouflage scheme. The instructions for this (and the Bronco kit) don't match what I can see in photographs, so I'm going to piece something together from the various images I do have.

                            Comment

                            • adt70hk
                              SMF Supporters
                              • Sep 2019
                              • 10428

                              #29
                              Originally posted by stona
                              I don't really have any references for the Horsa and strangely I can't find any drawings of the upper camouflage scheme. The instructions for this (and the Bronco kit) don't match what I can see in photographs, so I'm going to piece something together from the various images I do have.
                              In lack of concrete evidence Steve that sounds like a sensible plan.

                              ATB.

                              Andrew

                              Comment

                              • stona
                                • Jul 2008
                                • 9889

                                #30
                                I'm starting to suspect that the scheme was more variable than would have been allowed on powered aircraft. The image I have which most broadly matches what I see in the Pegasus Bridge gliders is this one - though obviously this lacks the 'invasion stripes'.

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	horsa camo_2.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	5.5 KB
ID:	1228808

                                I've got the model ready to start the camouflage, so I'll have to commit to something!

                                Click image for larger version

Name:	preshade_1.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	5.4 KB
ID:	1228809

                                Comment

                                Working...