Scale Model Shop

Collapse

StDs 1/72 AModel Hawker Hector

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve-the-Duck
    SMF Supporters
    • Jul 2020
    • 1731
    • Chris
    • Medway Towns

    #16
    It's way past time I did a little background, as the Hector is a little obscure. A new 'plane every eighteen months to two years? Well, such was the pace of development in the nineteen-thirties

    The Hector is the last of the Hawker multi-role biplane family that began with the Hart, the grand-daughter if you like. Each one of the family had a different specific role, and all but the Hector had a variant or development of the Kestrel engine

    The story really begins with the Fairey Fox, which came into service in 1925, and was the first light bomber fitted with an inline engine. As such it outperformed the current RAF fighters, like the Woodcock and Siskin. The Fox only ever equipped one squadron, 12, who still use a fox as their squadron badge to this day. Fairey committed the unforgivable sin of using an American engine, so the Fox replacement was undertaken by Hawkers, with the Rolls Royce Kestrel. And yes, the later Merlin engine was also named for a bird of prey, not a certain mage.
    The Hart entered service in 1930, proving so capable the Air Ministry, as many Air Ministries are wont to do, said 'can you make one that does 'fill in role'?'

    The first variant was the Demon, a two-seat fighter in the Brisfit mould. Interestingly, Airfix's Demon kit began life as a Hart
    Next is the Osprey, a 'navalised' Hart for fleet spotter / recce work
    The Audax was an army co-operation aircraft; ground support, recce, messaging. It's known as 'the'Art with an 'ook' because of the message pick-up hook hanging underneath
    The Hardy was a 'tropicalised' Audax, for use out in Empire, fitted with balloon tyres and extra engine cooling
    The Hind was a dedicated bomber meant to replace the Hart. The Shuttleworth Collection have one of the few still flying, and it is very very pretty

    The last of the line was the Hector. It was the Audax, army co-op, replacement. It was fitted with the more powerful Napier Dagger engine, as the Kestrel had about reached it's development potential, and there simply weren't enough to go round with all the Hind orders, as the RAF entered it's re-armament phase in the mid-'thrties. However, the Dagger wasn't suitable for tropicalisation, so the Hector never served abroad. The Hector was accepted for service before the prototype had flown, such was the goodwill generated by the Hart family. A Hart was used as test-bed, and the upper wing was straightened due to the change in the centre-of-gravity with the heavier engine. The Hector entered service late in 1936, and began to be replaced by Lysanders in 1938.
    613 Squadron Hectors flew from the UK in defence and supply of Calais in 1940. Soon after they were relegated to target-towing duties, eventually being struck off charge in 1942, having been replaced by the Hawker Henley, a monoplane which began life as a light-bomber competitor to the Battle, the same year the Hector entered service. The only foreign user of the Hector was the Irish Air Corps
    Oh, it was named for the Trojan prince. Was he Paris' big brother?

    Many foreign Hart and Hind users fitted their aircraft with radials. Most of the prototypes of later variants were either Harts or Audaxes modified

    There is also the Hartbees, more often called 'Hartbeeste', which was an Audax version built by and for South Africa

    The Hawker Fury single-seat fighter was, sort-of, built to give the fighter squadrons a way to deal with it's big sister, the Hart

    Comment

    • Allen Dewire
      SMF Supporters
      • Apr 2018
      • 4741
      • Allen
      • Bamberg

      #17
      Interesting read Chris and thanks for the info. It looks like a really cool kit and I'm sure you'll do a great job building it. Bring it on Sir!!!...

      Prost
      Allen
      Life's to short to be a sheep...

      Comment

      • Steve-the-Duck
        SMF Supporters
        • Jul 2020
        • 1731
        • Chris
        • Medway Towns

        #18
        Originally posted by Allen Dewire
        Interesting read Chris and thanks for the info. It looks like a really cool kit and I'm sure you'll do a great job building it. Bring it on Sir!!!...

        Prost
        Allen
        Let's just say that, like all my experience with A Model kits, it has 'issues'. But it's an easy learning curve

        Comment

        • Dave Ward
          SMF Supporters
          • Apr 2018
          • 10549

          #19
          Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
          The Hawker Fury single-seat fighter was, sort-of, built to give the fighter squadrons a way to deal with it's big sister, the Hart
          The final flourish was the Hawker Nimrod. the carrier based equivalent of the Fury..........
          Dave

          Comment

          • Steve-the-Duck
            SMF Supporters
            • Jul 2020
            • 1731
            • Chris
            • Medway Towns

            #20
            I did leave the Nimrod out on purpose, honest guv. And it's great that one, and a Fury are still flying

            Of course, technically, the Fury's 'daughter' is the Hurricane!

            Comment

            • Neil Merryweather
              SMF Supporters
              • Dec 2018
              • 5194
              • London

              #21
              Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
              I did leave the Nimrod out on purpose, honest guv. And it's great that one, and a Fury are still flying

              Of course, technically, the Fury's 'daughter' is the Hurricane!
              Was it not originally known as the Fury Monoplane?

              Comment

              • Steve-the-Duck
                SMF Supporters
                • Jul 2020
                • 1731
                • Chris
                • Medway Towns

                #22
                Cough wibble wheeze ' The truth is a three-edged sword'

                Much progress, and mis-steps, have been made

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2367.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	3.1 KB
ID:	1216178
                This is the Firewall at the back of the engine, out of 20 thou plasticard
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2368.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	2.9 KB
ID:	1216179
                And here it is in place. At this stage I didn't realise it would be all but invisible anyway, but there you go. At the front of the cockpit is a piece to represent the end of the fuel tank, visible behind the control panel
                I also added two small pieces to close off the engine intakes. I thought about using small piece of mesh, but looking at picture of the Napier Dagger, the intakes feed directly into the engine. It will keep the light out

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2369.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.5 KB
ID:	1216180Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2370.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	4.1 KB
ID:	1216181
                Fuselage closed up, and a bit of filler put in. The gunsight will cover any gaps on top of the cowling. And the firewall is, off course, invisible!
                I added two brass rods to hold the wings on as there is, once again, only a butt joint at the lower wing roots. That the rods are in the place of the wing spars just works

                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2371.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.3 KB
ID:	1216182
                Wings on.
                Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2372.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.4 KB
ID:	1216183
                Tail surface on. Cabin floor added, which needed quite a bit of work to get to fit properly
                I'm leaving the underside seam as it's visible on actual examples where the linen cover joins. I've left off the rudder as yet as i don't want to break off the aerial mast moulded on
                Also, I realised that what I thought was the gunner's seat is mounted too far back, and checking the plans it's supposed to be painted black, so I removed the tape strips and repainted. I still don't know what it is, and it seems to be mounted on a turntable?

                I've now reached the stage of painting. I'm a believer in putting as much together before painting, but with masking I'll need to do the cowling (very highly polished) I've left off the u/c legs. I'm probably going to use Alclad chrome for the cowling rather than polished aluminium.
                The upper wing is already painted, rattle-can silver, but that will be shown next time, once the roundels are on and it's DONE.

                Comment

                • Steve-the-Duck
                  SMF Supporters
                  • Jul 2020
                  • 1731
                  • Chris
                  • Medway Towns

                  #23
                  Top wing painted and decaled.
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2373.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	8.7 KB
ID:	1216251
                  Radio aerial bases out of 0,.5 brass rod
                  Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2374.JPG
Views:	4
Size:	10.1 KB
ID:	1216252
                  Aileron cables out of 0.2 rod, my go to for rigging
                  It's not really pink, just the way my camera apparently corrects the YELLOW spotlight!

                  A Model decals are very nicely thin, but they can break up, as you can see if you look closely at the roundels where I had to touch up the paint on the blue
                  The do include spare extra red spots, and plenty of W/T stencils in case, as happened, one just up and disappears

                  In my set of 'Hart family' decals, I've found some No.4 Squadron fin badges, so that's a bonus. They're ostensibly for an Audax, and you can't tell from the photos I've got whether the fin badge was carried, but they won't go on anything else so...

                  Comment

                  • Steve-the-Duck
                    SMF Supporters
                    • Jul 2020
                    • 1731
                    • Chris
                    • Medway Towns

                    #24
                    Okay, so here's where things are starting to go astray...
                    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2376.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.2 KB
ID:	1216402
                    I used the kit markings to start with for the registration number, and the last two digits out of a set of Ventura letters and numbers
                    And the heights don't match. So, I've subsequently replaced the '8 1' with more Ventura numbers
                    As previously stated, no photos definitively show the 4 Squadron badge in place, but I couldn't resist adding it

                    Comment

                    • Steve-the-Duck
                      SMF Supporters
                      • Jul 2020
                      • 1731
                      • Chris
                      • Medway Towns

                      #25
                      And now the not-quite disaster.

                      I decided to finally use the Alclad chrome I've had knocking about for a while for the shiny SHINY cowling
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2375.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.1 KB
ID:	1216403
                      Copious masking just in case, and on with the black base coat. So far no trouble
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2392.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.3 KB
ID:	1216404
                      First coat looked a little blotchy. It looked worse on the other side. So I left it a day to dry
                      And the second coat went VERY runny, and I dabbed it with some kitchen roll
                      And wiped the whole lot off!
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2393.JPG
Views:	3
Size:	3.4 KB
ID:	1216405
                      I'm now in a quandry whether to do some clean-up and have another go, or maybe even try some metallic powder to get an even more shiny result. The port side is just blotchy now
                      And there was me thinking I could finish this weekend and move on to the next one

                      Which will be this
                      Click image for larger version

Name:	SE5A.jpg
Views:	3
Size:	5.3 KB
ID:	1216514
                      Only in silver...

                      Comment

                      • Allen Dewire
                        SMF Supporters
                        • Apr 2018
                        • 4741
                        • Allen
                        • Bamberg

                        #26
                        Wow, that's a shame Chris. Do you have idea what might have gone wrong? I hope you can still get a decent result and finish this puppy up...Sure you can!!!

                        Prost
                        Allen
                        Life's to short to be a sheep...

                        Comment

                        • Steve-the-Duck
                          SMF Supporters
                          • Jul 2020
                          • 1731
                          • Chris
                          • Medway Towns

                          #27
                          My brother-in-law, who swears by Alclad (unlike me swearing AT it) thinks it may not have fully dried due to the temperature. If the second attempt goes astray, I may resort to Bare Metal foil, which I've had good results in the past - check out my Prototype Spit and Hurricane posts

                          I'm tempted to try metal powders when I get around to the Hawker Furies - a Mk.i, Mk.Ii, and a High-speed conversion (which was VERY shiny!)

                          Comment

                          • yak face
                            Moderator
                            • Jun 2009
                            • 13842
                            • Tony
                            • Sheffield

                            #28
                            Thats a blow chris , but looking at it , it seems most of it has come off so I would give it another go with something else. Personally I cant get on with Alclad either , i get better results with the Vallejo Metal Colors ( note . Not model air metallic ) they are easy to use , dont smell bad and are very hardwearing for an acrylic paint . Hope you can fix this , cheers tony

                            Comment

                            • Andy T
                              SMF Supporters
                              • Apr 2021
                              • 3239
                              • Sheffield

                              #29
                              I find the alclad chrome needs to be dusted on extremely lightly and built up in several almost invisible coats for best effect. Less is more, so it shouldn't be applied wet like regular paint.

                              Also, with it being lacquer based any subsequent coats will reactivate the previous ones no matter how long you have left them to dry, so touching it will strip the lot, as you've unfortunately found out.

                              Comment

                              • Steve-the-Duck
                                SMF Supporters
                                • Jul 2020
                                • 1731
                                • Chris
                                • Medway Towns

                                #30
                                Thanks for that, Andy and Tony
                                My brother-in-law said the same about dust coats

                                Tony, depending on how this turns out, I may try the Vallejo. However, my experience with their ordinary colours, limited as it is, has not been great

                                I need to practice more. With the airbrush I've had for FIFTEEN years!

                                Comment

                                Working...