It’s a weight saving device Steve. Unfinished ply would absorb moisture increasing weight and reducing structural strength so it had to be finished. Paints of the time had no varnish content so were varnished afterwards to keep out moisture. Varnished ply would therefore give the same protection, but would weigh significantly less than a painted fuselage because there is no paint there. I read this somewhere, but can’t remember where.
The Smythemeister's Albatros D.III
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Nice one Andy,get comfortable mind. . I think this is going to take a while!!
Hi Andrew.... I certainly hope it will be!!
Hi Ian,glad to be taking part.
......
...... T.B.C......Comment
-
HA!!.... Hope you're prepared for a long wit then Steve!
AK3 Dark Sand base coat, then panel definitions added with pencil. Gloss varnish to seal all in, so mistakes can be easily wiped off. Then streaks of thinned Vallejo Natural Wood, then New Wood added, with a small brush - it took me a few attempts, wiping all off & starting again - then sealed in with a gloss varnish tinted with orange
[ATTACH=CONFIG]n1215867[/ATTACH]
Apologies for jumping in with my process, it just takes a bit of time. I didn't use retarder, the model is small enough for the paint not to dry when adding streaks.
I admit it was an experiment, as I didn't have any oils ( I tried several methods on my guinea pig P-51 before comitting to the real thing ).
The model is actually the Revell reboxing of the Eduard model, that I got at a bargain price ( surprise, surprise ) - I did look at wood decals, but that would hve tripled the total price of the model
Dave
As much as the 'varnished cabinet' look is in vogue, and an interesting painting exercise, is there much evidence it ever actually happened?
One of the few arguments for is that less paint or covering saved weight, whereas an interesting argument against is the misinterpretation of light coloured fuselages.
However, 'Albatri' models used to be painted yellow, but on period orthochromatic film yellow looks black. So that doesn't add-up either
Many streaky paint techniques go well for props though
Maybe every WW1 German 'plane should just be painted red!
It’s a weight saving device Steve. Unfinished ply would absorb moisture increasing weight and reducing structural strength so it had to be finished. Paints of the time had no varnish content so were varnished afterwards to keep out moisture. Varnished ply would therefore give the same protection, but would weigh significantly less than a painted fuselage because there is no paint there. I read this somewhere, but can’t remember where.
...... T.B.C.....Comment
-
I haven't any evidence per se but there are a lot of colour profiles showing the varnished plywood finish, dating back to the middle of last century! There are modern replicas with this construction
[ATTACH=CONFIG]n1215919[/ATTACH]
This is a D.Va replica.............
Dave
...tis isn't it !!
Comment
-
.... Cont'd....
Well,after all that yap,I guess I should put a little progress!
Doesn't look much, but here's the cockpit stuff together....
It's quite nicely done and went together wellI have actually painted it up and glued the two halves together,but I can't find the pictures I took
I'll get some more taken this evening when, hopefully, I'll get some more done too.
Cheers for nowComment
-
-
Here's a thing about the varnishing
Apparently, so I am informed, Albatross specified that a pale green paint was supposed to cover the fuselage, but only 100 grams was supposed to be used!? That must have been the lightest, thinnest paint ever!
And who listens to manufacturer instructions anyway!Comment
-
Here's a thing about the varnishing
Apparently, so I am informed, Albatross specified that a pale green paint was supposed to cover the fuselage, but only 100 grams was supposed to be used!? That must have been the lightest, thinnest paint ever!
And who listens to manufacturer instructions anyway!
Had to strip all the paint from a Wasp helicopter. It was weighed prior to stripping, once all paint was removed and then again once repainted and the weight difference was amazing. Weight was critical to such a small flying machine and the reduced all up weight meant more could be carried.
So with the biplanes of WW1 having less paint would mean more ordinance could be carried and if on recce sorties them more power to weight would have given it an advantage. Clever thinning out the paint!!Comment
Comment