Scale Model Shop

Collapse

Chris T's Trenchworks Churchill 'Bobbin' Type-D Gold Beach (Geoff's D-Day 80th)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Steve-the-Duck
    SMF Supporters
    • Jul 2020
    • 1731
    • Chris
    • Medway Towns

    #1

    Chris T's Trenchworks Churchill 'Bobbin' Type-D Gold Beach (Geoff's D-Day 80th)

    Well, I've not posted this until the 'D' itself, even though it was effectively finished before the GB even properly started. Through me not paying attention

    So, Churchill Mk IV (R) AVRE Carpet Layer Type-D, 81 Sqn, 6th Assault Regt. (RE), 79th Armoured Division - Trenchworks / Warlord resin and 3d print in 28mm, figures 3d prints from 2djson on eBay, markings from Warlord

    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3112.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	3.5 KB
ID:	1226077Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3113.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	3.7 KB
ID:	1226078Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3114.JPG
Views:	1
Size:	4.1 KB
ID:	1226079Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3115.JPG
Views:	2
Size:	3.3 KB
ID:	1226080Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_3116.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	3.3 KB
ID:	1226081
    The carpet layers were deployed to cover the soft clay patches on the beaches, specifically Gold, to stop other vehicles bogging down. Strictly speaking, the crew probably wouldn't be out like that on the beach, so this really depicts a vehicle being tested at Orfordness. This is based on the only photo of a Type-D that shows the serial I could find, the 'R' suffix standing for 're-work' when Mk-IIIs and -IVs were brought up to later standard
  • vizenz
    SMF Supporters
    • Apr 2024
    • 426

    #2
    Well done. And a very interesting and exotic vehicle!

    Comment

    • Neil Merryweather
      SMF Supporters
      • Dec 2018
      • 5193
      • London

      #3
      Great start to the GB Steve.
      When are you going to do a DUKW....:tongue-out3:?

      Comment

      • Jim R
        SMF Supporters
        • Apr 2018
        • 15722
        • Jim
        • Shropshire

        #4
        That's excellent Steve. I had to double check the scale as it could easily pass for a larger scale.

        Comment

        • Guest

          #5
          Nice one The only detractor is that you put the deep-wading ducts on without any of the other preparation, when in fact those ducts were the very last thing to be fitted right before embarkation in the landing craft. But hey, everyone else does that too

          Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
          This is based on the only photo of a Type-D that shows the serial I could find, the 'R' suffix standing for 're-work' when Mk-IIIs and -IVs were brought up to later standard
          There were all kinds of letter suffixes on Churchills, and I’ve not been able to discover what they actually stood for. I know I’ve seen at least /A, /B and /C, and I think also /D and /E. It has nothing to do with the kind of special equipment installed, I know that, but other than that …

          Comment

          • Steve-the-Duck
            SMF Supporters
            • Jul 2020
            • 1731
            • Chris
            • Medway Towns

            #6
            Originally posted by Jakko
            Nice one :smiling3: The only detractor is that you put the deep-wading ducts on without any of the other preparation, when in fact those ducts were the very last thing to be fitted right before embarkation in the landing craft. But hey, everyone else does that too
            Yes indeed. One of the, VERY few, qhotos of this particular vehicle shows the hull Besa filled in, and the turret, or what's visible, looks to be completely covered. However...
            The photo I used for the wading trunking cables (and yes, I DID indeed miss the quick-release cable running into the turret) shows no waterproofing on the beast at all. So, like I said about the visible crew, and as I pre-empted the GB, let's call this a full-up kit test on Orfordness beach


            According to my info, the /suffixes (also \, and mine just a gap) are ill-defined, the 'R' for 'Reworked' being the only 'definite' one. Conjecture, published in Taylor's Warpaint Vol. 1) is that the letters were, originally, something like:
            A - AVRE, B - Bridgelayer, C - Carpet-layer, G - Crane. There's no 'F' though, which you'd think might stand for 'Fascine', but D, E, H, and K are anyone's guess
            I'd say somebody was trying to regularise an irregular system. Probably an RSM or WO1! I mean, they're all AVREs anyway, with the same mounting points, just different fitments

            Comment

            • Steve-the-Duck
              SMF Supporters
              • Jul 2020
              • 1731
              • Chris
              • Medway Towns

              #7
              Originally posted by Neil Merryweather
              Great start to the GB Steve.
              When are you going to do a DUKW....:tongue-out3:?
              I have NEVER had a reason to do a Duck, despite nomenclature to the contrary...

              Although...

              I COULD do the one Monty was driven aroind on the beaches in...

              Comment

              • Steve-the-Duck
                SMF Supporters
                • Jul 2020
                • 1731
                • Chris
                • Medway Towns

                #8
                Originally posted by Jim R
                That's excellent Steve. I had to double check the scale as it could easily pass for a larger scale.
                I get that a lot with my 28mm stuff! That's why a put a penny alongside at some stage of the build thread

                Thanks for the kund words chaps. AVRE SBG on the way
                Yes, I AM doing a collection of Hobart's 'Funnies. 'cos most they is Churchills'

                Comment

                • Lee Drennen
                  SMF Supporters
                  • Apr 2018
                  • 7711

                  #9
                  Nice clean build well done

                  Comment

                  • Guest

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
                    The photo I used for the wading trunking cables (and yes, I DID indeed miss the quick-release cable running into the turret) shows no waterproofing on the beast at all.
                    Odd. About the only reason I can think of for that is to see how the vehicle behaves, in terms of carpet-laying, with the ducts on?

                    Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
                    Conjecture, published in Taylor's Warpaint Vol. 1) is that the letters were, originally, something like:
                    A - AVRE, B - Bridgelayer, C - Carpet-layer, G - Crane. There's no 'F' though, which you'd think might stand for 'Fascine', but D, E, H, and K are anyone's guess
                    That already breaks down at A, unfortunately — this is a GP AVRE, census number clearly visible as T69114/B:

                    [ATTACH]510891[/ATTACH]

                    Originally posted by Steve-the-Duck
                    they're all AVREs anyway, with the same mounting points, just different fitments
                    The problem I have with linking the suffixes to AVRE equipment is that a lot of that equipment was attached to the generic mounting points on the hull sides, or was otherwise easily detachable, so why would a suffix be painted on to indicate the role?

                    Comment

                    • Steve-the-Duck
                      SMF Supporters
                      • Jul 2020
                      • 1731
                      • Chris
                      • Medway Towns

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Jakko

                      The problem I have with linking the suffixes to AVRE equipment is that a lot of that equipment was attached to the generic mounting points on the hull sides, or was otherwise easily detachable, so why would a suffix be painted on to indicate the role?
                      Exactly. The could just as easily be conversion batch suffixes, like the 'R'

                      I live quite close to the Royal Engineers museum. I wonder if they've got anything on record...

                      Comment

                      • Guest

                        #12
                        Might be worth a check, though I’m a bit sceptical you’d actually find something …

                        Comment

                        • Allen Dewire
                          SMF Supporters
                          • Apr 2018
                          • 4741
                          • Allen
                          • Bamberg

                          #13
                          Personally Chris, I don't care if it was an L, M, N, Or, P.........That's a great 'little' model of an interesting Hobart funny's Churchill. Yea, maybe the crew shouldn't be out like that, but it it gives an idea to how big the mat roll was and gives the finished model character. Top job!!!

                          Prost
                          Allen
                          Life's to short to be a sheep...

                          Comment

                          • Steve-the-Duck
                            SMF Supporters
                            • Jul 2020
                            • 1731
                            • Chris
                            • Medway Towns

                            #14
                            Further information is that the A, B, C, D and E, G and R, MAY be the stages of re-fits / re-works, as there were about seven individualvital mods done to IIIs and IVs in the rework programme
                            It KIND of makes sense, but sounds like more of a documentation record thing tho'.
                            Still, the sappers having the 'upgrade' stage right there on the vehicle also works

                            More research needed
                            Or just add letters by photo ref.

                            Comment

                            • adt70hk
                              SMF Supporters
                              • Sep 2019
                              • 10415

                              #15
                              Great work! Very well done.

                              Andrew

                              Comment

                              Working...