Scale Model Shop

Collapse

“British Fighting Vehicles - Why You Should Avoid Them”

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tim Marlow
    SMF Supporters
    • Apr 2018
    • 18882
    • Tim
    • Somerset UK

    #16
    Originally posted by stillp
    Largely due to their own officers' determination to prove the Anzacs were braver than the British. They had a far higher casualty rate than the British (who included my grandfather).
    Pete
    But the complete absence of strategic intelligence and total lack of drive from higher command was all ours. The whole debacle was prosecuted so ineptly due to British arrogance and the inbuilt superiority complex of the higher command, especially Churchill, Haig, and the Lunatic Jackie Fisher. The prevailing attitude was that we simply had to turn up and Johnny Turk would run away. When they didn’t, the only plan we had was to throw more and more men at the problem because we couldn’t be seen to withdraw…..it might give other foreigners ideas above their station! Oh, and we attacked the Dardanelles with battle cruisers on Churchill’s orders before we actually declared war on the Ottoman Empire……

    Comment

    • Airborne01
      • Mar 2021
      • 3939
      • Steve
      • Essex

      #17
      I know from personal experience squaddies were involved in evaluating APCs, AFVs (and clothing, small arms) etc. We wrote lengthy reports that were promptly disregarded by the suits and (mainly) civilian manned committees! Never was there a better truism than 'A camel is a horse designed by a committee!'
      Steve

      Comment

      • stillp
        SMF Supporters
        • Nov 2016
        • 8086
        • Pete
        • Rugby

        #18
        Yes, there was a lot of incompetence on the British side, although the basic concept of forcing Germany to fight on a second front, without their supply channels via the Black Sea, was a great idea. I don't think that Churchill supposed that the Turks would run away, rather that they would join the British, or at least keep out of our way - I presume that was the intelligence failure. Some amazing mistakes include as you said the shelling by cruisers in spite of the unsuitable trajectory of their armament thus giving the Turks and Germans ample warning of the intended invasion, and the local commander on Lemnos whose name I can't recall who decided that to acclimatise the troop to the hot weather, they should unload the supply ships then reload them in a different order, so the items needed first, particularly water tanks, were at the bottom of the holds. Many of the first invading force were carrying 200 rounds of ammunition that didn't suit their weapons, and at least one was disciplined for throwing away what for him was a useless dead weight, especially when wading through chest-deep seawater under machine gun fire.

        I have some personal connection to the debacle; my paternal grandfather had lied about his age to join up in December 1914, was sent to Gallipoli for the second invasion at Suvla Bay. Within 3 weeks he was in hospital for three bullet wounds in his shoulder and back. He lost the use of the upper muscles in his left arm, could use the wrist and hand but had to lift his left arm with the right. He was discharged from the army two weeks before his 18th birthday, but of course he'd signed up to serve His Majesty for the duration, so he was posted to an ammunition factory as a checker. It was there he met my grandma, so I suppose I wouldn't exist if it weren't for a few Turkish bullets.

        Pete

        Comment

        • Tim Marlow
          SMF Supporters
          • Apr 2018
          • 18882
          • Tim
          • Somerset UK

          #19
          Good summary. At the start of hostilities we basically stole two battleships (that we didn’t need) off of the Turks that had been bought and paid for. We never gave back the money after keeping the ships either. That was an exceptional diplomatic error, and possibly the single biggest reason Turkey turned to the central powers. Only an egomaniac would think they’d join us after that? Germany of course compounded that error and cemented the alliance by giving them Goeben after it was chased into their territory.

          The Dardanelles scheme was better than Fishers other plan to invade Germany via Denmark though. That one could’ve lost the war in a week.

          Comment

          • Scratchbuilder
            • Jul 2022
            • 2689

            #20
            Originally posted by Airborne01
            I know from personal experience squaddies were involved in evaluating APCs, AFVs (and clothing, small arms) etc. We wrote lengthy reports that were promptly disregarded by the suits and (mainly) civilian manned committees! Never was there a better truism than 'A camel is a horse designed by a committee!'
            Steve
            Very true. I actually fitted the SCAT mount for the battalions 432's so that the WOMBAT could be not only transported inside but could be hoisted up through the hatch and used in the open mounted version. And this was my workmate through the conversions...
            Click image for larger version

Name:	LAD.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	6.2 KB
ID:	1214248
            ... Great fun riding around in this, fitters wondered why it had no fuel when they came back and all their tea bags were missing - I soon confessed....

            Comment

            • Guest

              #21
              Originally posted by Gary MacKenzie
              I am more disappointed that people are angry at the messenger than the silly designs that are being pointed out.
              I have to agree. British AFVs do not, in general, have a good rep where build quality and ability to perform maintenance are concerned, and that’s what she’s talking about — and is an area in which, I get the impression, she does know what she’s talking about.

              Comment

              • Tim Marlow
                SMF Supporters
                • Apr 2018
                • 18882
                • Tim
                • Somerset UK

                #22
                Originally posted by Scratchbuilder
                Poor education and direct speaking, my downfall....
                No, not you…..it’s how the Anzacs speak in general. Every sentence seems to end with an upwards inflexion, making it sound like a question.

                Comment

                • Scratchbuilder
                  • Jul 2022
                  • 2689

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Tim Marlow
                  No, not you…..it’s how the Anzacs speak in general. Every sentence seems to end with an upwards inflexion, making it sound like a question.
                  You should hear me after a few JD's - very Ozz... or is that Sozz....
                  No offence taken.

                  Comment

                  Working...