Yes its A ???
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Even tough old it’s still a Tamiya so little probs in construction and some nice etch too.
Have fun Bob :thumb2:Comment
-
And it shows no sign of a 167. Crazy!!!Life's to short to be a sheep...Comment
-
Comment
-
Thankfully for the Germans the design of the StuG IV had been looked at before Alkett was badly bombed. I much prefer the StuG 111.Comment
-
Comment
-
Guest
Page 359 of Kraftfahrzeuge und Panzer der Reichswehr, Wehrmacht und Bundeswehr ab 1900 (Werner Oswald, Stuttgart: Motorbuch Verlag, 2004) agrees with the table you posted, and comparing the two, I don’t get the impression one is a direct copy of the other. However, this doesn’t really prove anything substantial, of course. Oddly, Spielberger’s Sturmgeschütze doesn’t seem to give an Sd.Kfz. number for the StuG IV at all.Comment
-
-
-
Guest
Comment
-
Comment
-
Guest
However (to add to the post by Dave Ward above) it says 1141 were taken up by the Waffenamt while Krupp produced 1111 (the other, first, thirty were assembled at Daimler-Benz on chassis from Nibelungenwerke).Comment
Comment