Probably more than I have, then 
Yes, that’s what I thought I remembered too, but one of the books I looked in to write the above, mentioned the Besa replacing the howitzer, so I went with that.
Edit, the next day: later yesterday night, I was looking through the book The Churchill Tank by Chris Ellis (Tanks Illustrated No. 23; Poole: Arms and Armour Press, 1987), and on page 11, I came across this photo:
[ATTACH]474893[/ATTACH]
That neatly explains that: the normal Mk. II had a Besa in the hull, but the Mk II CS had a 2-pounder there and a 3-inch howitzer in the turret, effectively making it a reverse of the Mk. I.

Yes, that’s what I thought I remembered too, but one of the books I looked in to write the above, mentioned the Besa replacing the howitzer, so I went with that.
Edit, the next day: later yesterday night, I was looking through the book The Churchill Tank by Chris Ellis (Tanks Illustrated No. 23; Poole: Arms and Armour Press, 1987), and on page 11, I came across this photo:
[ATTACH]474893[/ATTACH]
That neatly explains that: the normal Mk. II had a Besa in the hull, but the Mk II CS had a 2-pounder there and a 3-inch howitzer in the turret, effectively making it a reverse of the Mk. I.
Comment