Scale Model Shop

Collapse

A new little friend.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dave Ward
    SMF Supporters
    • Apr 2018
    • 10549

    #16
    The Monoprice is exceeding my expectations - it's not a speed machine & the heated bed takes a long time to warm up, but...............
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4264.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	5.6 KB
ID:	1198280
    Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4265.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	8.9 KB
ID:	1198281
    These are the superstructure bits for the 1/350 French armoured cruiser 'Gueydon'- the above bit is 60mm long. I just need to tweak the support settings a bit to make them easier to remove. I've still not tried the finest setting yet, I'm still looking for a suitable subject. Meanwhile the Anet is grumbling way, printing the hull of the cruiser - 6 hours per half...............
    Dave

    Comment

    • adt70hk
      SMF Supporters
      • Sep 2019
      • 10400

      #17
      Originally posted by Dave Ward
      All the panels replaced & now it's working!
      [ATTACH=CONFIG]n1198176[/ATTACH]
      Quite a relief to finally get it all together...............
      Always a gamble, buying 'not working' from Ebay - if it had been something electronic, I would been in real trouble - the mainboard alone costs around £70 to replace. Mechanical stuff, I've got a chance, and I was lucky! I think it will be a long while before I take another risk like that, though!
      Dave
      Nicely done!

      Comment

      • adt70hk
        SMF Supporters
        • Sep 2019
        • 10400

        #18
        Originally posted by Dave Ward
        The Monoprice is exceeding my expectations - it's not a speed machine & the heated bed takes a long time to warm up, but...............
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]n1198280[/ATTACH]
        [ATTACH=CONFIG]n1198281[/ATTACH]
        These are the superstructure bits for the 1/350 French armoured cruiser 'Gueydon'- the above bit is 60mm long. I just need to tweak the support settings a bit to make them easier to remove. I've still not tried the finest setting yet, I'm still looking for a suitable subject. Meanwhile the Anet is grumbling way, printing the hull of the cruiser - 6 hours per half...............
        Dave
        That's turned out really well Dave!

        Comment

        • Jim R
          SMF Supporters
          • Apr 2018
          • 15668
          • Jim
          • Shropshire

          #19
          Originally posted by Dave Ward
          The Monoprice is exceeding my expectations
          That's great Dave. You really do have an eye for a bargain.

          Comment

          • Dave Ward
            SMF Supporters
            • Apr 2018
            • 10549

            #20
            This is the 60 gun frigate Dryade ( 1828 ) in 1/700 - not quite there - the supports were a bit tricky, & the rudder came off with them
            Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4267.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	4.9 KB
ID:	1198286
            The model is from Thingiverse by user 'PC_Model_Yard', and is intended for SLA resin printing, but I reckoned that the Monoprice could handle it. The supports are the real killers, I printed out the USS Cairo - an ACW gunboat, but the supports were such that I couldn't get them off without causing severe damage!
            Dave

            Comment

            • stillp
              SMF Supporters
              • Nov 2016
              • 8090
              • Pete
              • Rugby

              #21
              Why are the supports so difficult to remove Dave? Is the process very different from removing moulded parts from a sprue?
              Pete

              Comment

              • Jim R
                SMF Supporters
                • Apr 2018
                • 15668
                • Jim
                • Shropshire

                #22
                Originally posted by stillp
                Why are the supports so difficult to remove Dave? Is the process very different from removing moulded parts from a sprue?
                I was also wondering why it was so difficult

                Comment

                • Dave Ward
                  SMF Supporters
                  • Apr 2018
                  • 10549

                  #23
                  Originally posted by stillp
                  Why are the supports so difficult to remove
                  Originally posted by Jim R
                  was also wondering why it was so difficult
                  The supports actually touch the model in more than one place, from the build plate up to the piece they are supporting ( the printer can't print on thin air ) and along the side of the model, which you can't actually see. Theoretically they should just snap/twist off, but they rarely do! You can alter the distances between the support & model, but to provide support they do have to touch! If you make the distance too big, then the part you are trying to support will droop down & fuse to the supports, making it even worse. Another factor is the PLA - it's not like polystyrene - it's tough and resilient, and can tear lumps off the surface it you're not careful. The model is constructed of printed layers, which can split ( delaminate ) if you are unlucky, or use too much force.
                  There's no real formula for this, the model has to be assessed, and orientated to the best position, which gives the least supports, or the supports running on a flat surface, where they are easier to remove. I have read that putting the model in the freezer can make supports easier to snap off, but I haven't tried that yet!
                  It can be very frustrating at times!!
                  Dave

                  Comment

                  • JR
                    • May 2015
                    • 18273

                    #24
                    Both the printer and your ability are impressive to us mere plastic stickers !
                    Nice one Dave, you must be thrilled that it paid off .

                    Comment

                    • stillp
                      SMF Supporters
                      • Nov 2016
                      • 8090
                      • Pete
                      • Rugby

                      #25
                      Couldn't you saw the supports off with a razor saw Dave?
                      Pete

                      Comment

                      • Dave Ward
                        SMF Supporters
                        • Apr 2018
                        • 10549

                        #26
                        Originally posted by stillp
                        Couldn't you saw the supports off with a razor saw Dave?
                        On larger flat pieces, yes, but on curved & indented areas that's not feasible - screwdrivers, side cutters, pliers, scalpel & Stanley knife are the tools of choice
                        These are the supports running up the side of a cruiser
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4269.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	6.4 KB
ID:	1198325
                        and the underside of the supports
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4270.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	6.3 KB
ID:	1198326
                        Theoretically, the 'join' between support & model should be light enough to just peel away, but that's not always the case.
                        It's not too bad on big parts, but the small parts need careful consideration
                        This is the same part - 1/350 deck gun from the USS St Louis printed in 3 orientations, to see which is best..................
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4271.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	4.3 KB
ID:	1198327
                        The one on the right is a non-starte, the printer can't cope with the vertical barrel
                        The centre is with the barrel on the build plate ( inverted ) - it looks better, but there's a nasty scar on the top ( visible ) barrel. The left is with the gun in it's fitted position. The top of the barrel is clear - the problem being the supports will need very careful removal. The gun has a separate cradle & turntable. Luckily the St Louis has only 2 of these guns!
                        On a better note, this in John Cobb's Railton Special Land speed record holder from 1948
                        Click image for larger version

Name:	DSCF4268.JPG
Views:	0
Size:	4.7 KB
ID:	1198324
                        This model takes a long time to print, as it is hollow - it has outer walls & inner walls, with infill between. If it were 'solid' it would only have outer walls and infill, which takes less time to print. The original model, in 1/24, would have taken 14 hours to print - this is in 1/48, and took just over 6 hours to print.
                        Dave

                        Comment

                        • Dave Ward
                          SMF Supporters
                          • Apr 2018
                          • 10549

                          #27
                          Sad to say the Monoprice died - I'd been printing some small parts for the gun carrier - I heard a slight fizzing sound & I looked up to see it puffing blue smoke. I hurriedly unplugged it. After a cooling down period, I plugged it in again, but nothing. I opened the case - the mainboard had a burnt-out chip - it had actually burnt a hole in the circuit board! So, the board is a write-off, I looked for replacements, but they run out at about £50. You can upgrade the board, but that's even more expensive & in my opinion that would be like fitting a modern engine to a Morris 1000! The machine was a cheap 'for repair' purchase from ebay. I'm going to keep an eye out for a non - working one on ebay, but not many around ( It's over 5 year old - an age in FDM printers! ).
                          It's very useful to have a smaller printer - the SunLu prints big parts very well, but with print times of 10 hours+, a smaller compact printer could be turning out several smaller parts in the same time. I'll be keeping an eye out for a suitable replacement!
                          Dave

                          Comment

                          Working...