Titanic with a difference

[Guest]

There was a programme on the telly recently that explained that the dazzle didn't just make the vessel blend into the background (which is presumably what conventional camo does) but it confuses the low-level view of a submarine into not knowing the direction or speed of the target nor its heading, nor its size given that the sub can't be sure of the distance. The images in the programme were certainly confusing.

[grumpa]

Very nice so far, I can see Garfield approves

[Guest]

Very nice work so far.


Scott

[monica]

looking great ,so far,real liking all your hard work on this one,


its paying off,

[peterairfix]

Now for the next part of the build.


I have now started on the decks its now a standard build for the moment so heres the pics [ATTACH]116482.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116483.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116484.IPB[/ATTACH]

[monica]

looking good peter ,and nice progress,as well,

[Guest]

well that colour scheme is out there keep in there ,getting to scale the key

[eddiesolo]

There was a programme on the telly recently that explained that the dazzle didn't just make the vessel blend into the background (which is presumably what conventional camo does) but it confuses the low-level view of a submarine into not knowing the direction or speed of the target nor its heading, nor its size given that the sub can't be sure of the distance. The images in the programme were certainly confusing.

The only drawback to this scheme was the smoke generated by the engines, that is one thing that could not be disguised-the direction of smoke meant the vessel had to going that way.

[papa 695]

Very nice work so far Peter

[takeslousyphotos]

Cracking Job on the camo Peter.

[peterairfix]

Not much done over the last few days but i have the fore deck and poop decks finished and the well decks and i have now started on the promande deck [ATTACH]116987.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116988.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116989.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116990.IPB[/ATTACH]

[ATTACH]116991.IPB[/ATTACH]